تحلیل رویکردهای کارکردی و ساختاری ارتباطات علمی در تولید دانش توسط پژوهشگران حوزه علم سنجی در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد علم‌سنجی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

3 استاد گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: تحلیل رویکردهای کارکردی و ساختاری ارتباطات علمی در تولید دانش توسط پژوهشگران حوزه علم‌سنجی در ایران است.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش ترکیبی است و از روش‌های پیمایشی و اسنادی استفاده شده و اطلاعات مورد نیاز این پژوهش از پرسشنامه و مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته گردآوری شده است.
یافته‌ها: نشان می‌دهد که محیط‌های ارتباطی‌ای همچون بسترهای مجازی به دلیل قابلیت تعاملی‌بودنی که دارند ظرفیت بالایی در ارائه و انتقال اطلاعات دارند که همین ویژگی به شکل‌گیری روابط علمی میان پژوهشگران و سهولت دستیابی به آخرین یافته‌های علمی منجر می‌شود و ایجاد این روابط علمی قوی بر تولید علم و ارتباطات بی‌واسطه بین کنشگران اجتماع علمی مؤثر خواهد بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: سرعت پیشرفت در علم همیشه به نحوه اشاعه نتایج پژوهش پژوهشگران و به خواسته آنها برای در‌جریان‌گذاشتن سایر محققان علاقه‌مند به تکمیل این نوآوری‌ها با استفاده از فناوری‌ها و رویکردهای جدید بستگی داشته است. ارتباطات علمی زمینه‌ساز ایجاد یک جامعه علمی پویا و دانش‌مدار است. فعالیت علمی هر دانشمند زمانی هویت و اهمیت می‌یابد، که به جامعه علمی عرضه شود؛ در آثار و مطالعات دیگران متجلی شود؛ و با تحلیل‌های فردی دیگران درآمیزد تا سرانجام بر ذخیره‌های دانش افزوده شود؛ بنابراین ارتباط، اساس و ماهیت علم است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Functional and Structural Approach-Oriented of Scientific Communication in Knowledge Production by Scientometrics Researchers in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Dehghanpoor 1
  • Lale Samadi 2
  • Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli 3
1 Master of Scientometrics, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran .
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Information Science, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: This research aims to analyze the functional and structural approaches of scientific communication in knowledge production by researchers in the field of scientometrics in Iran to show how knowledge production by researchers in a context is affected by the functional and structural approach-oriented.
Methodology: This research has been done by a mixed method, However, content analysis has been used. The research sample was the scientometric experts who were working in the universities. We had five phases for complementing this research. In the first phase, we tried to identify the scientometricians and extract the required information from the universities websites. In the 2nd phase, we designed a questionnaire to answer the research questions and in the third phase we used semi-structured interviews for the qualitative part of the research. In the fourth phase, the data gathered from the previous phases, are categorized separately. To analyze the data from interviews we used content analysis techniques and finally began to analyze them with the appropriate software such as SPSS.
Findings: The finding has shown that researchers in this field tend to use specialized tools to establish their scientific communication and the most common reason for participating in this type of tools are factors such as understanding specific issues, knowing the scientific community around them, etc. Furthermore, it was determined that scientometric studies to produce knowledge used two main tools which are social networks such as Email, Linkedin, ResearchGate, Whatsapp, and Weblogs and scientific search engines like Microsofacademia, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar. Besides, for maintaining precedence in proposing ideas and theories, they prefer to share their knowledge in academic environments through formal channels such as bringing them up in scientific forums. According to the structural approach, most of the facilities provided to researchers by Iran’s scientific institutions were technological facilities and they wanted to increase government support. Creating virtual scientific communication centers and making scientific workgroups in different scientific fields was another finding. Researchers emphasized research development factors such as international and national university cooperation, Open Access to scientific and educational resources, management based on expertise and knowledge, and material and spiritual encouragement of researchers.
Conclusion: Scientometric Researchers tend to use two-way and specialized tools such as databases and believe that this type of communication has improved their communication process in response to their needs. It has also affected the quality of their products and scientific activities. The results showed that virtual communication environments have a high capacity for the production and transfer of science as well as the formation of strong scientific relationships due to their interactive capabilities. It was also found that scientometrics researchers in using such databases more than others to generate knowledge and communicate because of the two-way and specialized nature of communication channels such as Google Scholar. The results showed that the most motivation and reasons for the presence of researchers in social media are factors such as finding out the specific issues of their field, searching and obtaining scientific and educational information, sharing scientific information, obtaining general information and news, and in the second place, things such as Getting to know the scientific community around you, consulting and thinking with other researchers, promoting and developing professional activity, and chatting online are the least used by researchers. Scientometric researchers believe that both official channels (such as databases) and unofficial channels (such as conferences) are suitable for presenting their ideas and theories, but most researchers share their scientific achievements in Formal environments are considered more reliable than informal environments. However, for various reasons, including the filtering of some official channels, some researchers believe that these conditions make it difficult to share their scientific achievements. The most important factors for the strengthening and development of research in society from the perspective of researchers are factors such as: creating a virtual center for scientific and research communication, determining suitable scientific communication patterns and making it coherent, appropriate scientific policy making concerning interdisciplinary approaches, determining scientific topics that can be researched with Interdisciplinary approaches in scientific centers are the formation of appropriate scientific working groups using experts from different fields. From the point of view of researchers in the field of scientometrics, the facilities, and facilities that society should provide to this group of researchers include government support for interdisciplinary research, material support for researchers, and setting up a research and development unit. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Scientometrics Researchers
  • Functional Approach
  • Structural Approach
  • Scientific Communication
باقری بنجار، عبدالرضا، مصلحی، نرگس، بیگی، بانو، محمدی، میثم. (1394). بررسی رابطه ارتباطات علمی با خود اثربخشی دانشگاهی دانشجویان. فصلنامه توسعه اجتماعی، (10) 2، 79-100 (DOI:10.22055/QJSD.2016.11945)
پرهام‌نیا، فرشاد، نوشین‌فرد، فاطمه، حریری، نجلا، محمداسماعیل، صدیقه. (1396، الف). تأثیر عوامل رفتاری بر ارتباطات علمی: تحلیلی مبتنی بر رگرسیون چندگانه. فصلنامه مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات، (28) 2، 85-106
پرهام‌نیا، فرشاد، نوشین‌فرد، فاطمه، حریری، نجلا، محمداسماعیل، صدیقه. (1396، ب). تأثیر عوامل ساختاری بر ارتباطات علمی و تولیدات علمی دانشگاه‌های ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات، (7) 1، 48-72
پلویی، آرزو، نقشینه، نادر. (1395). ارتباطات علمی از منظر آرای نیکلاس لومان. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات، (27) 2، 7-20
داورپناه، محمدرضا. (۱۳۸۶). ارتباط علمی، نیاز اطلاعاتی و رفتار اطلاع‌یابی. چاپار
ریتزر، جورج، گودمن، داگلاس جی. (1390). نظریه جامعه‌شناسی مدرن، ترجمه: خلیل میرزایی و عباس لطفی‌زاده، تهران: انتشارات جامعه شناسان، چاپ اول
شایان‌مجد، مجید. (1392). مطالعه روند پژوهش در حوزه علم‌سنجی در ایران و بررسی الگوی رفتار علمی پژوهشگران در این حوزه. سازمان کتابخانه‌ها، موزه‌ها و مرکز اسناد آستان قدس رضوی، (5) 21، 1-15
طباطبائیان، حبیب‌الله، قادری، رضا. (1386). بومی‌سازی سیاست‌گذاری علم و تکنولوژی در ایران، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی، واحد تربیت معلم، چاپ اول.
فصیحی، امان‌الله. (1389). بررسی کارآمدی نظریه کارکردگرایی. معرفت فرهنگی اجتماعی، (1) 2، 109-131
قانعی‌راد، محمدامین. (1381). عوامل هنجاری و سازمانی مؤثر بر میزان بهره‌وری اعضای هیئت علمی. پژوهشنامه فرهنگی، (4) 7، 167-206
کفاشان کاخکی، مجتبی، خلیلی، محسن. (1398). نقش ارتباط علمی در فرایند تولید دانش در علوم انسانی. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، (9) 1، 107-123(DOI: 10.22067/RIIS.V0I0.62323)
گلینی‌مقدم، گلنسا، صمیعی، مریم. (1397). نقش رسانه‌های اجتماعی در ارتباطات علمی اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. فصلنامه مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین، (4) 15، 317-346(DOI: 10.22054/NMS.2018.27860.371)
محمدی، اکرم. (1386). تأثیر ارتباطات علمی بر تولید دانش. جامعه‌شناسی ایران، (8) 1، 52-75
نوروزی چاکلی، عبدالرضا. (1388). کاربرد روش‌ها و شاخص‌های کتاب‌سنجی در مطالعات علم‌سنجی. فصلنامه عیار، (14) 9، 22-72 (DOI: 20.1001.1.26767503.1388.14.22.4.0 )
نوروزی چاکلی، عبدالرضا. (1390). آشنایی با علم‌سنجی (مبانی، مفاهیم، روابط و ریشه‌ها). تهران: سمت، مرکز تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، مرکز چاپ و انتشارات
 
Barnlund, D. C. (2008). A transactional model of communication. In. C. D. Mortensen (Eds.), Communication theory (2nd ed. , pp47–57). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction.
 
Buela-Casal, G., Gutie´rez-Martı´nez, O., Bermu´dez-Sa´nchez, M. P., & Vadillo-Mun˜oz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics,71(3):  349–365.
 
Joel, k. (2005). Extent of congruence between student perception and media representation of quality of higher institution. The University of Oklahoma: 173.
 
KATZ, DANIEL. (2014). THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES. Oxford, 163-204
 
Kenna, R; Mryglod, O; Berche,B. (2017). A scientists’ view of scientometrics: Not everything that counts can be counted. Condensed Matter Physics, (20)1, 1-10
 
Khasseh, Ali Akbar; Soheili, Faramarz. (2019). Tracing the Landscape of Research in Scientometrics and Related Metric Areas. IranDoc, (33)3, 941-966
 
Nesterov A.V. (2011). The Influence of Rankings on the Development of Universities. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 38(1): 13–16
 
Radford, Gary; Radford, Marie. (2005). Structuralism, post-structuralism, and the library: de Saussure and Foucault. Emerald. (61)1, 60-78
 
Rauchfleisch, Adrian; Schäfer, Mike. (2018). Structure and development of science communication research: co-citation analysis of a developing field. Journal of Science Communication, (3)17, 1-21
 
Bagheri Banjar, Abdul Reza; Moslehi, Narges; Biggie, Lady; Mohammadi, Maitham. (2014). Examining the relationship between scientific communication and academic self-efficacy of students. Social Development Quarterly, (10)2, 79-100 (DOI:10.22055/QJSD.2016.11945) [In Persian]
Parham Nia, Farshad; Noushin Fard, Fatemeh; Hariri, Najala; Mohammad Ismail, Siddiqa. (2016). The effect of behavioral factors on scientific communication: an analysis based on multiple regression. National Library and Information Organization Studies Quarterly, (28)2, 85-106  [In Persian]
 
Parham Nia, Farshad; Noushin Fard, Fatemeh; Hariri, Najala; Mohammad Ismail, Siddiqa. (2016). The impact of structural factors on scientific communication and scientific production of Iranian universities. National Library and Information Organization Studies Quarterly, (7)1, 48-72  [In Persian]
 
Plowi, desire; Nakshineh, rare. (2015). Scientific communication from the perspective of Nicolas Lohmann. National Library and Information Organization Studies, (27)2, 20-7  [In Persian]
 
Davrpanah, Mohammadreza. (2007). Scientific communication, information need and information seeking behavior. Chapar [In Persian]
 
Ritzer, George; Goodman, Douglas J. (2011). Theory of Modern Sociology, translated by: Khalil Mirzaei and Abbas Lotfizadeh, Tehran: Sociologists Publications, first edition. [In Persian]
 
Shayan Majid, Majid. (2012). Studying the research process in the field of scientometrics in Iran and examining the pattern of scientific behavior of researchers in this field. Organization of Libraries, Museums and Documents Center of Astan Quds Razavi, (5) 21, 1-15  [In Persian]
 
Tabatabaian, Habibullah; Kadri, Reza. (2017). Localization of science and technology policy in Iran, Tehran: Jihad Academici, Teacher Training Unit, first edition. [In Persian]
 
 
Fashihi, Amanullah. (2010). Examining the effectiveness of functionalism theory. Social Cultural Knowledge, (1)2, 109-131 . [In Persian]
 
Ganei Rad, Mohammad Amin. (2002). Normative and organizational factors affecting the productivity of faculty members. Cultural Research Journal, (4)7, 167-206  [In Persian]
 
Kafashan Kakhki, Mojtabi; Khalili, Mohsen. (2018). The role of scientific communication in the process of knowledge production in humanities. Library and Information Research Journal, (9)1, 107-123   (DOI: 10.22067/RIIS.V0I0.62323) [In Persian]
 
Gliny Moghadam, Glensa; Sami, Maryam. (2017). The role of social media in academic communication of Allameh Tabatabai University faculty members. New Media Studies Quarterly, (4)15, 317-346   (DOI: 10.22054/NMS.2018.27860.371) [In Persian]
 
Mohammadi, Akram. (2007). The effect of scientific communication on knowledge production. Sociology of Iran, (8) 1, 52-75  [In Persian]
 
Noroozi Chakoli , Abdolreza. (2009). Application of bibliometric methods and indicators in scientometric studies. Ayar Quarterly, (14)9, 22-72  
(DOI: 20.1001.1.26767503.1388.14.22.4.0 )  [In Persian]
 
Noroozi Chakoli , Abdolreza. (2011). Familiarity with scientometrics (basics, concepts, relationships and roots). Tehran: Semit, Humanities Research and Development Center, Shahid University, Printing and Publishing Center  [In Persian]