Mapping Knowledge Structure of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Making Studies: A Co-Occurrence Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Business Management and Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Science and Technology Policy, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to map and  analyze the knowledge structure of science, technology, and innovation policymaking studies using a co-occurrence network. Understanding the trends in the literature related to science, technology, and innovation policymaking enables policymakers to gain a broader perspective on significant global issues. Additionally, researchers can gain insights into the most prevalent topics in this field and navigate the boundaries of knowledge in science, technology, and innovation policymaking.
Methodology: The current research is a descriptive study that employs scientometric indicators along with documentary and social network analysis methods. The research population consists of 3,868 articles and reviews published between 1969 and 2023 in the field of science, technology, and innovation policymaking. Data for the study was collected on June 3, 2023, by accessing the Web of Science database (a product of Clarivate Analytics). Microsoft Excel was utilized to analyze the research data and create a geographical distribution map. Additionally, Vosviewer software was employed to visualize the co-occurrence network of papers in the field of science, technology, and innovation policymaking, while Gephi was used to clean and remove unrelated keywords.
Findings: The number of published articles on the topic of science, technology, and innovation policymaking has been steadily increasing. Among the countries, the United States, England, China, the Netherlands, and Germany have produced the highest number of publications in this field. An analysis of journal publications revealed that the Sustainability Journal, with 89 articles; the Environmental Science and Policy Journal, with 74 articles; and the Journal of Cleaner Production, with 69 articles, have the most publications related to science, technology, and innovation policymaking. The co-occurrence network in this field consists of 221 nodes and 8035 unique links, and the most frequently occurring keywords among these nodes include science, policy, policy making, innovation, government, and technology. Furthermore, over the past five years, topics such as COVID-19, big data, sustainable development, data science, citizen science, circular economy, urbanization, energy transition, and CO2 emissions have been extensively discussed. The co-occurrence network in the field of science, technology, and innovation policymaking consists of five clusters: sustainable development, public health, climate change, government support, and public participation. These clusters represent different aspects of science, technology, and innovation policymaking.
The findings indicate that the articles published by Iranian researchers on science, technology, and innovation policymaking have received 924 citations. In other words, each of them received an average of 7.7 citations, and 77.59 percent of them were cited at least once. In addition, these articles have performed less than the global expectation by obtaining a category-normalized citation impact equal to 0.92. Also, 79.38 percent of these scientific productions result from international collaborations and the highest amount of collaboration has been done with researchers from the USA, England, Australia, and Canada.
Conclusion: The policymaking process for science and technology is highly complex, and influenced by various factors, including global conditions, challenges, developments, trends, country of origin, and territorial considerations. To promote sustainable development goals, science and technology policies should prioritize innovation and entrepreneurship. Additionally, governments should focus on supporting activities that contribute to economic prosperity in this area. Health is a vital economic sector that not only directly impacts economic growth but also influences the development of other sectors. Policymakers in science and technology across various countries emphasize the significance of health research and the rapid deployment of new technologies, such as pharmaceuticals, diagnostic tools, remote treatments, and medical equipment. Science, technology, and innovation are crucial for sustainable development, as they aid in the formulation and implementation of policies and regulations concerning climate change. These policies may involve establishing standards, implementing energy regulations and taxes, utilizing tools to control pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, and protecting water resources and the environment. The government plays a crucial role in the formulation of science and technology policies, especially in developing countries, where it aligns with national priorities through various policy instruments. These instruments, often referred to as governance tools, are measures utilized by the government to accomplish specific policy objectives. Public participation in the science and technology policy-making process allows society to directly influence policies and decisions in this domain. This promotes transparency, trust, and the empowerment of society in matters related to science and technology, ultimately resulting in the adoption of improved policies, informed decisions, and positive outcomes for the community.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

آقاجانی، ح.، لرستانی، س.، و رحیمی­راد، ز. (1393). نقش مشارکت عمومی در سیاست­گذاری علم و فناوری با تبیین رویکرد سه مرحله‌ای ]مقاله کنفرانسی[. اولین کنفرانس اقتصاد و مدیریت کاربردی با رویکرد ملی، بابلسر. https://civilica.com/doc/289881/
ابراهیمی درچه، ا.، منصوری، ع.، پشوتنی­زاده، م.، میرباقری­فرد، ع.، و شعبانی، ا. (1402). سیاست‌ها و معیارهای ارزیابی بروندادهای علمی علوم انسانی از دیدگاه متخصصان: مطالعه موردی رشته‌های زبان و ادبیات. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات. 39(1)، 100-63. https://doi.org/10.22034/jipm.2023.705519
ادبی‌فیروزجاه، ح.، و چشمه‌سهرابی، م. (1399). تحلیل استنادی مقالات مربوط به بیماری کووید-19 بین سال‌های 2020 تا 2021. پژوهش‌های کتابخانه‌های دیجیتالی و هوشمند. 7(شماره 4 (پیاپی 28))، 37-48.
    https://doi.org/10.30473/mrs.2022.59810.1474
باقری‌زاده، س.م.(1390). سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری عنصر بی‌همتای ارزش‌آفرینی. فصلنامه توسعه تکنولوژی صنعتی. 9(17)، 5-14. https://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_1714.html
بنیادی­نائینی، ع.، و مقیسه، ز. (1401). مطالعه آلتمتریک بروندادهای علمی پژوهشگران ایرانی در حوزه ویروس کرونا. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی، 8(شماره ا، بهار و تابستان)، 239-254.
    https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.13360.1447
بیانلو، ز.، و زارع احمدآبادی، ح.(1395). پیش‌بینی تحقیقات فناوری در قلمرو منتخب از انرژی خورشیدی: کاربرد تحلیل پتنت و شبکه عصبی مصنوعی. مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 4(1)، 149–171.
    https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2017.499
پیوسته، ص. (1398). سیاست‌گذاری علم، فناوری و نوآوری: ابعاد و پیامدهای اجتماعی. سیاست علم و فناوری، 12(2)، 57-43. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13685.html
چیذری، ع.، صدیقی، س.ح.، پیشوایی، م.س.، و آذر، ع. (1401). مطالعه مقایسه‌ای دو ابزار «نقشه راه فناوری» و «سبد فناوری» با رویکرد علم‌سنجی. علم‌سنجی کاسپین، 9(2)، 109–121.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.9.2.109
حبیب زاده، ا.، و نوروزی، ن. (1396). تحلیلی بر وضعیت انتشارات علمی و ثبت پتنت در نظام ملی نوآوری ایران. رهیافت، 27(65)، 22–35. https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13612.html?lang=fa
رسولی، ب.، و شهریاری، پ. (1400). چاله‌ها و چالش‌های پژوهش در علوم انسانی در ایران؛ پنجره‌ای به روی سیاست‌گذاری علم. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 37(2)، 333–361.
    https://doi.org/10.52547/jipm.37.2.333
روشنی، س.، قاضی نوری، س.، و طباطبائیان، س. ح. (1392). تحلیل شبکه هم نویسندگی پژوهشگران حوزه سیاست‌گذاری و مدیریت فناوری در ایران. سیاست علم و فناوری، 6(4)، 17-1.
    https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12897.html?lang=fa  
زارع احمدآبادی، ح.، و یوسف تبارمیری، ص. (1392). پیش‌بینی فناوری با تحلیل محتوی حق ثبت اختراع؛ تحلیلی بر آینده فناوری لعاب. مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 1(2)، 57–85.  https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2013.33
صفدری رنجبر، م.، کریمیان، ز.، و فهام، ا. (1400). سیاست‌گذاری عمومی و حکمرانی (با نگاهی ویژه به فناوری و نوآوری). تهران: موسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور. 252 ص. https://book.nrisp.ac.ir/book_8.html
علائی آرانی، م.، نقشینه، ن.، و طاهری، س.م. (1391). شاخص‌های خروجی علم و فنّاوری در جمهوری اسلامی ایران: مطالعه موردی رابطه میان پروانه‌های ثبت اختراع و تولیدات علمی مخترعان ایرانی. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 27(4)، 1033–1052.  https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699180.html
علیزاده، پ.، قاضی نوری، س.، امیری مقانجوقی، م.، و قاضی نوری، س. (1397). طراحی ترکیبی از ابزارهای سیاستی برای افزایش هزینه کرد بخش کسب‌وکار ایران در فعالیت‌های تحقیق و توسعه. بهبود مدیریت، 12(3)، 1-24.  https://www.behboodmodiriat.ir/article_81001.html
فرنودی، ص. (1388). ارائه چارچوب ارزیابی فناوری‌های سلامت در نظام بهداشت و درمان ایران؛ مطالعه موردی ربات روبولنز. سیاست علم و فناوری، 2(3)، 75–86. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12790.html
قاضی نوری، س.، و قاضی نوری، س. (1400). مقدمه‌ای بر سیاست‌گذاری علم، فناوری و نوآوری. تهران: مرکز نشر آثار علمی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. 631 ص.
https://pub.modares.ac.ir/book_treasure.php?mod=viewbook&book_id=384&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
قاضی نوری، س.، کاظمی، ح.، روشنی، س.، و ردائی، ن. (1394). بررسی اهداف و ابزارهای سیاستی در اسناد مرتبط با علم و فناوری. سیاست علم و فناوری، 8(3)، 86-71.
 https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12934.html?lang=fa 5
قانعی راد، م. (1385). تعاملات و ارتباطات در جامعه علمی (بررسی موردی رشته علوم اجتماعی). تهران: پژوهشکده    مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی. 308 ص.
 http://www.lib.ir/book/65464612/تعاملات-و-ارتباطات-در-جامعه-علمی/ 
محمدجانلو، ل.، شیرازی، ب.، مهدوی، ا.، و سلطان­زاده، ج. (1397). تحلیل پتنت با استفاده از داده‌کاوی برای شناسایی و تعیین ارتباطات میان فناوری‌ها. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 33(4)، 1575–1610. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699489.html?lang=fa
مقیسه، ز.، و شکرزاده هشترودی، ن. (1399). تحلیل مقاله‌های حوزه سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری در کشورهای جهان در بازه زمانی 2019-1980. رهیافت، 30(2)، 50-37.
    https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13831
مهدوی، م. ن.، و غفرانی، م. ب. (1380). بررسی تطبیقی تجارب سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری در جهان. رهیافت، 11(24)، 94–110. https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13291.html
نوارباف زاده، ن.، رستمی، م.، مهری، ز.، خاصه، ع.، نیکزادیان، م.، و کلانتر، م. (1401). تحلیل استنادی پژوهش‌های کووید-19 در پایگاه استنادی اسکوپوس. مجله علم‌سنجی کاسپین، 9(2)، 100–108.
      http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.9.2.100
یعقوبی، م.، و غفاری، م.م. (1385). ساختار مفهومی سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری در حوزه مهندسی. آموزش مهندسی ایران، 8(32)، 49-21.  https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2007.528
یعقوبی، م.، غفاری، م.م.، و پاکپور، م. (1385). آینده‌نگری فناوری، ابزار سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری «مطالعه تطبیقی 30 کشور جهان»]مقاله کنفرانسی[. اولین همایش آینده‌پژوهی، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/360589/
Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a Driver of Preferential Attachment in the Evolution of Research Collaboration Networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.002
Abdullaev, B., Israilov, Z., Sotvoldiev, A., Hojiboev, M., & Mukhamadieva, M. (2023). Leading Research Trends on Innovation Funding: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 38(1). https://scienceweb.uz/publication/7279
Adabi Firozjah, H., & Cheshmehsohrabi, M. (2020). Citation Analysis Articles Related to Covid -19 Disease between 2020 and 2021. Digital and Smart Libraries Researches, 7(28), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.30473/mrs.2022.59810.1474 [In Persian].
Aghajani, H., Lorestani, S., & Rahimi Rad, Z. (2014).The role of public participation in science and technology policy making with a three-step procedure [Paper presentation]. 1st conference on economics and applied management with a national approach, Babolsar. https://civilica.com/doc/289881/  [In Persian].
Alaee Arani, M., Naghshineh, N., & Taheri, S. M. (2012). Science and Technology Output Indicators in the Islamic Republic of Iran: A Case Study on the Relevance between Patents and Scientific Products of Iranian Inventors. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 27(4), 1033-1052. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699180.html [In Persian].
Alizadeh, P., Ghazinoory, S., Amiri, M., & Ghazinoori, S. (2018). Designing a Policy Mix to Enhance the Business Expenditure on Research and Development (R&D) in Iran. Journal of Improvement Management, 12(3), 1-24.  
      https://www.behboodmodiriat.ir/article_81001.html [In Persian].
Álvarez, I., Natera, J. M., & Suarez, D. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation Policies Looking Backwards, Forwards and Beyond: Developmental Challenges and Opportunities for Ibero-America in The Era of Covid-19. Revista de Economía Mundial, 56. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i56.4862
Aoki, R. (2020). Science, Technology & Innovation and Future Design. In Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific (pp. 79–88). Springer Singapore.
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5407-0_6
Bagherizadeh, S. H. (2011). Science and technology Policy Making as A Unique Element of value creating. Quarterly journal of Industrial Technology Development, 9(17), 5-14. https://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_1714.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Bayanloo, Z., & Zare Ahmadabadi, H. (2016). Technology Forecasting Researches in Selected Area of Solar Energy: Use The Patent Analysis and Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Technology Development Management, 4(1), 149-171.
      https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2017.499  [In Persian].
Bonyadi Naeini, A., & Moghiseh, Z. (2022). Altmetric Study of Scientific Outputs of Iranian Researchers in Coronavirus. Scientometrics Research Journal, 8 (Issue 1, spring & summer), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2020.13360.1447 [In Persian]
Borchelt, R., & Hudson, K. (2008). Engaging the Scientific Community With the Public-Communication As a Dialogue, Not a Lecture. Science Progress, 21.( spring • summer). https://www.scienceprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/print_edition/engaging_scientific_community.pdf
Brito, L. (2013). The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation Policies and Instruments for a Paradigm Shift Towards Sustainable Development. In Technologies for Sustainable Development (pp. 13–19). Springer.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00639-0_2
Cappellano, F., & Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2020). The Mission-Oriented Approach for (cross-border) Regional Development. Sustainability, 12(12), p. 5181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125181
Chaminade, C., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2019). Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy: Old Patterns and New Challenges. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.179
Chizari E., Sedighy S. H., Pishvaee, M. S., & Azar, A (2022). A Comparative Study of "Technology Roadmap" and "Technology Portfolio" Using Scientometric Approach. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 9(2), 109-121.
      http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.9.2.109  [In Persian].
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct A Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview And Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Ebrahimi Dorcheh, E., Mansouri, A., Pashootanizadeh, M., Mirbagheri fard, A. A., & Shabani, A. (2023). Evaluation Policies And Criteria Of Humanities Scientific Outputs From Experts' Point of View: A Case Study of Language and Literature Fields. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 39(1), 63-100.
      https://doi.org/10.22034/jipm.2023.705519 [In Persian].
El-Jardali, F., Bou-Karroum, L., & Fadlallah, R. (2020). Amplifying The Role of Knowledge Translation Platforms in The COVID-19 Pandemic Response. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00576-y
Farnoodi, S. (2009). Presenting a Framework for Evaluation of Health Technologies in Health and Medical System of Iran; Case Study: Robolens Robot. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 2(3), 75-86. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12790.html [In Persian].
Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer Brand Relationships Research: A Bibliometric Citation Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.010
Fuchs, V. R. (1996). Economics, Values, and Health Care Reform. American Economic Review, 86(1), 1–24. https://web.stanford.edu/~jay/health_class/.
Ghaneirad, M. A. (2006). Interactions and Communication in The Scientific Community: A Case Study of The Field of Social Sciences. Tehran: Institute for Cultural, Social and Civilization Studies. 308 p.
      http://www.lib.ir/book/65464612/تعاملات-و-ارتباطات-در-جامعه-علمی/  [In Persian].  
Ghazinoori, S., & Ghazinoori, S. (2021). Science, Technology and innovation Policy Making; An Introduction. Tehran. Tarbiat Modares University. 631 p.
https://pub.modares.ac.ir/book_treasure.php?mod=viewbook&book_id=384&slc_lang=fa&sid=1  [In Persian].
Ghazinoori, S., Kazemi, H., Roshani, S., & Radaei, N. (2015). A Review on Policy Objectives and Instruments in Iran’s S&T Documents. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 7(3), 71-86.  https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12934.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Habibzadeh, E., & Norouzi, N. (2017). Analysis of Scientific Publications and Patenting in National Innovation System in Iran. Rahyaft, 27(65), 22-35.
      https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13612.html?lang=en  [In Persian].
Haghani, M., & Bliemer, M. C. J. (2020). Covid-19 Pandemic and The Unprecedented Mobilisation of Scholarly Efforts Prompted By A Health Crisis: Scientometric Comparisons Across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV Literature. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2695–2726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03706-z
Harper, L., Kalfa, N., Beckers, G. M. A., Kaefer, M., Nieuwhof-Leppink, A. J., Fossum, M., Herbst, K. W., & Bagli, D. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Research. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 16(5), 715-716.
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343645/
Heath, C., Luff, P., & Svensson, M. S (2003). Technology and Medical Practice. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(3), 75–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00341
Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., & Li, J. (2014). A Bibliometric Study Of China’s Science and Technology Policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1521–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1406-4
Huang, Y., Ding, X. H., Liu, R., He, Y., & Wu, S. (2019). Reviewing the Domain of Technology and Innovation Management: A Visualizing Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 9(2), p. 215824401985464). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019854644
Huda, S., Sugandi, Y. S., & Sumadinata, W. S. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Articles on Policy Innovation in The Education Sector During The Covid-19 Pandemic Using The Scopus Database. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 6(1), 865–874. https://journal.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/seiko/article/view/4078
Jia, Y., Liu, C., Yin, C., & Zhu, Q. (2020). The Construction of Science And Technology Innovation Policy Design Framework—Take Shandong Province as an Example. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 2(1), 34–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIUC-08-2019-0015
Krause, J., Croft, D. P., & James, R. (2007). Social Network Theory in the Behavioural Sciences: Potential Applications. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0445-8
Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and The Mapping of Scientific Change: A Co-Word Analysis of Research into Environmental Acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3–4), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02020078
Lohse, S., & Canali, S. (2021). Follow *The* Science? on The Marginal Role of The Social Sciences In The COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(4), 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00416-y
López-rubio, P., Roig-tierno, N., & Mas-tur, A. (2021). Mapping Trending Topics and Leading Producers In Innovation Policy Research. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper905
López-Rubio, P., Roig-Tierno, N., & Mas-Tur, A. (2022). Which Regions Produce The Most Innovation Policy Research? Policy Studies, 43(5), 1112–1134.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.1937595
Madani, F. (2015). ‘Technology Mining’ Bibliometrics Analysis: Applying Network Analysis and Cluster Analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1), 323–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1685-4
Mahdavi, M. N., & Ghofrani, M. B. (2002). Comparative Study of Science and Technology Policy Experiences in The World. Rahyaft,  11(24), 94-110.
      https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13291.html?lang=en  [In Persian].
MahmudJanlu, L., Shirazi, B., Mahdavi, I., & Soltanzadeh, J. (2018). Patent Analysis by Data Mining for Identifying and Determining Relationships among Technologies. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(4), 1575-1610.  
      https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699489.html?lang=en [In Persian]. 
Marsch, L. A., & Gustafson, D. H. (2013). The Role of Technology in Health Care Innovation: A Commentary. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 9(1), 101–103.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2012.750105
Moghiseh, Z., & shokrzadeh, N. (2020). Analyzing Research Outputs of The Science and Technology Policies in The World Between 1980 and 2019. Rahyaft, 30(2), 37-50.
      https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13831 [In Persian].
Navarbafzadeh, N., Rostami, M., Mehri, Z., Khaseh, A., Nikzadian, M., & Kalantar, M. (2022). Citation Analysis of COVID-19 Research in The Scopus Citation Database. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 9 (2),100-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.9.2.100  [In Persian].
Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 5200–5205.
      https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Bortagaray, I., Sierra-González, J. H., García-Estévez, J., & Orozco, L. A. (2021). Policy and Governance of Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable and Inclusive Development in Latin America. Policy and Governance of Science, Technology, and Innovation: Social Inclusion and Sustainable Development in Latin América. (pp. 1–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80832-7_1
Peivasteh, S. (2019). STI Policy Making: Social Aspects and Cocequences. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 43-57.
      https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13685.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Peters, H. P. F., & Van Raan, A. F. (1993). Co-word-Based Science Maps of chemical Engineering. Part I: Representations by Direct Multidimensional Scaling. Research Policy, 22(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)90031-C
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141.
      https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Putera, P. B., Suryanto, S., Ningrum, S., Widianingsih, I., & Rianto, Y. (2022). Three Decades of Discourse on Science, Technology and Innovation in National Innovation Three Decades of Discourse on Science, Technology and Innovation in National Innovation System : A Bibliometric Analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1).
      https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2109854
Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword Co-occurrence Network-Based Methods to Foster Systematic Reviews of Scientific Literature. PLoS ONE, 12(3), p. e0172778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778
Rashid, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Higher Education and Research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 14(2), 340–343.
      https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020946700
Rasuli, B., & Shahriari, P. (2021). Barriers to Research in the Humanities in Iran: a window to Science Policy. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 37(2), 333-361. https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_699668.html  [In Persian].
Reale, F. (2021). Mission-oriented Innovation Policy and The Challenge Of Urgency: Lessons From Covid-19 and Beyond. Technovation, 107, p. 102306 .
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102306
Roshani, S., Ghazinoori, S., & Tabatabaeian, S. H. (2013). A Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Iranian Researchers in Technology Policy and Managemen. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 6(2), 1-17.
      https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12897.html?lang=en  [In Persian].
Safdari Ranjbar, M., Karimmian, Z., & Faham, E. (2021). Public Policy and Governance (Special Focus on Technology and Innovation). Tehran: National Research Institute for Science Policy.252 p.  https://book.nrisp.ac.ir/book_8.html  [In Persian].
Santos, A. B. (2015). Open Innovation research: Trends and Influences – A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), 131–165.
      https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_003.002_0010
Santos, B. S., Silva, I., Lima, L., Endo, P. T., Alves, G., & Ribeiro-Dantas, M. da C. (2022). Discovering Temporal Scientometric Knowledge in COVID-19 Scholarly Production. Scientometrics, 127(3), 1609–1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04260-y
Shang, T., Miao, X., & Abdul, W. (2019). A Historical Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Disruptive Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 208–226.
      https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-05-2018-0056
Shine, K. I. (2004). Technology and health. Technology in Society, 26(2–3), 137–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2004.01.022
Statista (2023). Leading countries by research and development (R&D) expenditure as share of gross domestic product (GDP) worldwide in 2022. Retrieved 23 Sep in https://www.statista.com/statistics/732269/worldwide-research-and-development-share-of-gdp-top-countries/
Stryjek, J. (2021). Counteracting the COVID-19 Crisis with Innovation Policy Tools: A Case Study of the EU’s Supranational Innovation Policy. European Research Studies Journal, XXIV(Issue 3), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2365
Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2020). The Dynamics of The Studies of China’s Science, Technology and Innovation (STI): A Bibliometric Analysis of an Emerging Field. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1335–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03500-x
Sun, Y., & Grimes, S. (2016). The Emerging Dynamic Structure of National Innovation Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 17–40.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1778-0
Surana, K., Singh, A., & Sagar, A. D. (2020). Strengthening Science, Technology, and Innovation-Based Incubators to Help Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, p. 120057.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120057
Tarkar, P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Education System. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9), 3812–3814.
      http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/16620
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Tsigaris, P., & Erfanmanesh, M. (2021). Publishing Volumes in Major Databases Related to Covid-19. Scientometrics, 126(1), 831–842.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03675-3
Ullah, F., Shen, L., & Shah, S. H. H. (2023). Value Co-creation in Business-to-Business Context: A Bibliometric Analysis Using HistCite and VOSviewer. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027775
Ulnicane, I. (2016). “Grand Challenges” Concept: A Return of The “Big Ideas” in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy? International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 11(1/2/3), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078378.
Verma, A. K., & Prakash, S. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on Environment and Society. Journal of Global Biosciences, 9(5), 7352–7363.
      https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3644567   
Yaghobi, M., & Ghafari, M. M. (2007). Conceptual Structure of Science and Technology Policy with Emphasis on Engineering. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 8(32), 21-49.  https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2007.528  [In Persian].
Yaghobi, M., Ghafari, M. M. & Pakpour, M. (2007). Technological Foresight, Science and Technology Policy Making Tool "Comparative Study of  30 Countries of The World"  [Conference presentation]. 1st Conference of Future Research, Tehran.
      https://civilica.com/doc/360589/  [In Persian].
Yang, Y., Liang, M., Sun, S., & Zou, Y. (2022). Strengthening Top–Down Design? Mapping science, Technology and Innovation Policy Developments in China in The Age Of COVID-19. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 31,( 2), 375–396.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2022.2070508
Zare Ahmadabadi, H., & Youseftabar Miri, S. (2013). Using Patent Content Analysis for Technology Forecasting; an Analysis of Glazing Technology Future. Journal of Technology Development Management, 1(2), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2013.33  [In Persian].
Zhang, J., Xie, J., Hou, W., Tu, X., Xu, J., Song, F., Wang, Z., & Lu, Z. (2012). Mapping The Knowledge Structure of Research on Patient Adherence: Knowledge Domain Visualization Based Co-Word Analysis and Social Network Analysis. PloS One, 7(4), p. e34497. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034497

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics