Identifying Key Trends and Emerging Thematic Clusters in the Research Field of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Student in Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Uni-versity of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran,

2 Ph.D Student in Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Uni-versity of Qom, Qom, Iran.

3 Ph.D Student in Computer Engineering, Software Engineering, Kashan University, Kashan, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to analyze scientific publications in the field of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software using the Web of Science database, as well as to create a scientific map of this domain. Additionally, the study aims to examine thematic clusters related to ERP software.
Methodology: This quantitative study utilized the Web of Science citation database to analyze data extracted from it. The statistical population comprised 2,531 records spanning from early 1994 to the end of 2024, employing a complete population sampling method. The search was conducted using relevant keywords and advanced search tools to identify all pertinent articles. Data analysis was performed using VOSviewer software and included examining spatial and temporal distributions, international collaboration networks, and identifying dominant topics to better understand scientific developments in this field.
Findings: The findings indicate that China leads among countries with 57 records, followed by the United States and India. European countries such as the United Kingdom, Germany, and France also make significant contributions to scientific output. Among universities, Ohio University ranks first with 78 records, Florida State University is second with 38 records, and National Central University ranks third with 36 records. These top three universities have produced a total of 152 papers, with American institutions accounting for the majority of scientific production in this field. Of the top 10 institutions, six are located in the United States. Additionally, institutions such as the Indian Institute of Technology and the Egyptian Knowledge Bank represent non-Western countries, highlighting global participation in this field. Among authors, V. Gao from China leads with 14 records, while authors such as Andrea, Legria, Werich, and Worcester closely compete with 10 articles each. The highest scientific production was recorded in 2013, with 158 information records. Among the journals, the International Journal of Organizational Information Systems ranks first with 98 articles. The Journal of Industrial Management and Data Systems follows in second place with 65 articles, while the Journal of Business Process Management ranks third with 53 articles. An analysis of the languages used in the articles reveals that English, as the international language of science and research, is overwhelmingly dominant in the field of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. With 2,465 articles out of the total, it is evident that most scientific research and publications in this field are conducted in English. This dominance may be attributed to greater access to scientific resources, international collaborations, and the necessity to publish in reputable journals. In contrast, other languages such as Portuguese, German, and Spanish account for significantly fewer articles—25, 12, and 11 respectively—indicating comparatively less research activity in these languages. The findings revealed that keywords related to ERP software were grouped into ten clusters, with the ERP software cluster exhibiting the highest degree of centrality. Additionally, the density map indicates that this keyword has the greatest density. Other topics within the clusters include critical success factors, technology adoption models, ERP implementation challenges, organizational performance, process improvement, software customization, emerging technologies, artificial intelligence, and big data. The findings also reveal a broad connection among business concepts such as management, efficiency, innovation, and performance, underscoring the importance of business as the central focus of research in this field. Additionally, the strong link between business and information technology, automation, and concepts related to small and medium-sized enterprises highlights an emphasis on enhancing performance and adapting to customer needs. On the other hand, the findings highlight significant connections between concepts related to the implementation and success of ERP software. A substantial portion of the research is dedicated to exploring solutions and factors that influence the successful implementation of these systems. Additionally, ERP serves as a tool to enhance coordination within organizational supply chains, making the selection of the appropriate system and attention to critical success factors essential for ERP project success.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the ERP software field has experienced significant growth in recent decades and is increasingly integrating new technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and cloud computing. An analysis of scientific literature reveals that topics like supply chain management, data analysis, and integration with other management systems are among the most prominent trends in this area. However, a more detailed investigation into the impact of new technologies on ERP system performance, implementation challenges in developing countries, and integration with other management systems remains lacking. Therefore, by identifying these gaps, this study paves the way for future research and emphasizes that advancing technology and management in the ERP field requires innovative and specialized approaches.

Keywords

Main Subjects


حاجیان، ح.، و زرجینی، الف. (1402). تحلیلی بر کاربردهای داده‌کاوی در صنعت بیمه بر اساس شبکه هم‌رخدادی واژگان‌ها و شناسایی معتبرترین مجلات با شاخص استناد به پژوهش‌های علمی با استفاده از رویکرد علم‌سنجی. پژوهشنامه بیمه، 13(1)، 71-86. https://doi.org/10.22056/ijir.2024.01.06
عباداله، ج.، جعفری فر، ن.، و مهدوی، م. (1403). تحلیل و مصورسازی آثار علمی جهان در حوزه کسب‌وکارهای دیجیتال. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، 10(2)، ۱۰۳-۱۲۸.  
کریمی، ر.، و نوروزی، ی. (1399). تحلیلی بر نظریه‌های مدیریت دانش: رویکردی مبتنی بر نگاشت علمی. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی, 6(2)، 103-122.https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.4452.1292
کفشدوز محمدی، ف.، حسینی‌نیا، غ.، میگون‌پوری، م.، و وظیفه دوست، ح. (1400). علم‌سنجی و ارائه مسیر پژوهش‌های آتی توسعه اکوسیستم کسب‌وکارهای استارت‌آپی. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی، 7(2)،51-76.
میرشریف، م.، عالم تبریز، الف.، و موتمنی، ع. (1402). مسیر تحول توانمندی‌های هوش کسب‌وکار و رسانه اجتماعی. مطالعات مدیریت کسب‌وکار هوشمند، 12(45)، 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22054/ims.2023.71110.2256
نوکاریزی، م.، و زینلی‌چهکند، الف. (1391). بررسی وضعیت تولیدات علمی اعضای هیات ‌علمی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد از سال 2000 تا 2010. پژوهش‌نامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 2(۱)، 73– 98.
Ahmi, A., & Saidin, S. Z. (2022). Current landscape of the enterprise resource planning (ERP) research: A bibliometric review [Conference presentation]. AIP Conference Proceedings: 10th International Conference on Applied Science and Technology, 2644 (1), 030005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106544
Amer, M., & Hilmi, Y. (2024). ERP and the metamorphosis of management control: An innovative bibliometric exploration. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología-Serie de Conferencias, 3
Bahit, M., Handayani, M., & Haryanto, R. (2021). Bibliometric analysis on the concept of managing and integrating ERP (enterprise resource planning) in the MSMEs (macro, small and medium enterprises) sector [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of 2nd Annual Management, Business and Economic Conference (AMBEC 2020). Atlantis Press.
Bahssas, D. M., AlBar, A. M., & Hoque, M. R. (2015). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: Design, trends and deployment. The International Technology Management Review, 5(2), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.2991/itmr.2015.5.2.2
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
Chaudhry, M. G., Nawab, S., & Shafi, K. (2021). Enterprise resource planning systems and knowledge management: A review of the literature and conceptual framework. Journal of Management and Research, 8(1), 179- 211. https://doi.org/10.29145/jmr/81/080108
Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-131. http://facweb.cs.depaul.edu/jnowotarski/is425
Ebadollah Amoughin, J., Jafarifar, N., & Mahdavi, M. (2024). Analysis and visualization of the world's scientific works in the field of Digital Businesses. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 10(2), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2024.11021.2128
      [In Persian].
Fogarty, J. S., Barry, R. J., & Steiner-Lim, G. Z. (2022). Auditory equiprobable NoGo P3: A single-trial latency-adjusted ERP analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 182, 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.10.001
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. The Management Information Systems Quarterly (MISQ), 19(2), 213-236.
Gunasekaran, A., & Shea, T. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational Advancements through Enterprise Information Systems: Emerging Applications and Developments. IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-968-7
Hajiyan, H., & Zarjini, A. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of keywords co-occurrence network and the most cited journals on data mining techniques in insurance industry using scientometrics approach. Iranian Journal of Insurance Research, 13(1), 71-86.
Kafshdooz Mohammadi, F., Hosseininia, G. H., Meiguonpoory, M., & Vazifehdust, H. (2021). Scientometrics and presenting the future research path to the development of startup business ecosystems. Scientometrics Research Journal, 7(2), 51-76.
Karimi, R., & Norouzi, Y. (2020). An Analysis of knowledge management theories: An approach based on scientific mapping. Scientometrics Research Journal, 6(2), 103-122.
Klaus, H., Rosemann, M., & Gable, G. G. (2000). What is ERP? Information Systems Frontiers, 2, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026543906354
Martins, E. J., & Belfo, F. P. (2024). A systemic framework for enterprise resource planning systems: A bibliometric networking analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 239, 1549–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.330
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 1-19.
Mirsharif, M., Alemtabriz, A., & Motameni, A. (2023). The evolution path of business intelligence & social media capabilities. Business Intelligence Management Studies, 12(45), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22054/ims.2023.71110.2256 [In Persian].
Mohadab, M. E., Khalene, B. B., & Safi, S. (2017). Enterprise resource planning: Introductory overview [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies (ICEIT), Rabat, Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITech.2017.8255306
Nah, F. F. H., Tan, X., & Teh, S. H. (2004). An empirical investigation on end-users' acceptance of enterprise systems. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 17(3), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2004070103
Nowkarizi, M., & Zeynali Chahkand, A. (2012). The participation of the faculty members of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in scientific production from 2000 to 2010. Library and Information Science Research, 2(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v2i2.11059
      [In Persian].
Şahinaslan, Ö., Şahin, A., & Şahinaslan, E. (2023). Bibliometric analysis and mapping of the benefits and challenges of cloud ERP systems. Istanbul Business Research, 52(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2023.52.1169291
Sardo, F., & Alves, M. C. (2018). ERP systems and accounting: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 14(3), 1–18.
Shehab, E. M., Sharp, M. W., Supramaniam, L., & Spedding, T. A. (2004). Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review. Business Process Management Journal, 10(4), 359-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150410548056
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D.(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. The Management Information Systems Quarterly (MISQ), 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Waiczyk, C., & Ensslin, E. R. (2013). Avaliação de produção científica de pesquisadores: Mapeamento das publicações científicas. Revista Contemporânea De Contabilidade, 10(20), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2013v10n20p97