The Relationship Between Research Funding and Citation Impact and International Collaboration of the Top Two Percent of Iranian Scientists in the Fields of Strategic Technologies

Alinezhad Chamazkoti, Fatemeh; Mirhaghjoo, Saeedeh

doi:10.22070/rsci.2025.20696.1832

The Relationship Between Research Funding and Citation Impact and International Collaboration of the Top Two Percent of Iranian Scientists in the Fields of Strategic Technologies

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Fatemeh Alinezhad Chamazkoti ¹

Saeedeh Mirhaghjoo ²

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Science and Technology Assess-ment, Islamic World Science and Technology Monitoring and Cita-tion Institute (ISC), Shiraz, Iran

² Instructor, Department of Science and Technology Assessment, Is-lamic World Science and Technology Monitoring and Citation Insti-tute (ISC), Shiraz, Iran

10.22070/rsci.2025.20696.1832

Abstract

Purpose: The primary objective of this article is to investigate the statistical relationship between the allocation of financial resources and both the level of collaboration and the scientific impact of the top 2% of Iranian scientists in strategic technologies. Specifically, this study examines the relationships among funding, citation rates, international scientific collaborations, and the quality and thematic focus of scientific publications.
Methodology: This study is an applied bibliometric analysis that also incorporates citation analysis. The statistical population consisted of 3,249 articles published in 2022 by 297 Iranian scientists ranked among the top 2% in strategic technologies, according to Stanford University’s 2023 list. Data were retrieved from Scopus using advanced search queries based on author IDs (AU-ID). The extracted data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS, employing descriptive statistics as well as inferential statistical tests, including independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and regression analysis.
Findings: The findings revealed a significant and positive relationship between financial support and the number of citations received by the scientific publications of the top 2% of Iranian scientists. Overall, a strong link was observed between research funding and both the quality and quantity of research outputs produced by these scientists in strategic technologies. The results indicate that the financial resources secured by highly cited Iranian scientists are positively associated with the growth of their citation impact. In particular, studies that received financial support were more likely to have a greater number of citations compared to those without such support, suggesting that funding is associated with higher scholarly impact. Moreover, a significant association was found between financial support and the extent of international scientific collaborations. The evidence suggests that financial backing is positively correlated with broader scientific networks and improvements in both the quality and quantity of international collaborations. The findings further indicate that funded publications outnumber non-funded ones in the fields of life sciences, health and medical sciences, and social sciences. Within the subfields of strategic technologies, the highest proportion of funded research was observed in engineering, materials science, energy, chemistry, physics, and astronomy. Additionally, financial support was found to influence the distribution of research outputs across journals of varying quality levels, with funded studies being published in a broader range of journals with different quality rankings. Moreover, publications receiving financial support were predominantly published in Q1 journals, suggesting that funding is associated not only with a quantitative increase in output but also with enhanced research quality. The findings also highlighted the observed association between financial support and the promotion of cross-border scientific collaborations, particularly with countries such as China, Malaysia, and the United States. Additionally, this financial support enabled researchers to access advanced research infrastructure, attend international conferences, and participate in postdoctoral programs, thereby enhancing their global visibility and scholarly influence. The study also found that researchers with access to funding were more likely to publish in journals based in high-ranking scientific nations such as the UK, the Netherlands, the USA, and Switzerland. The availability of financial support not only alleviated the cost barriers associated with publishing in high-impact open-access journals but also facilitated greater dissemination and visibility of Iranian scientific output on the international stage. These patterns suggest that funding is linked to both strategic publishing decisions and the capacity to compete in the global knowledge economy.
Conclusion: Given the observed association between financial support, citation counts, international scientific collaborations, and the quality of journals publishing the works of the top 2% of scientists in Iran in the field of strategic technologies, policymakers must prioritize the targeted allocation of research funding as a strategic objective. Strengthening financial support for academic researchers and research institutions can significantly enhance the effectiveness and quality of scientific output in critical areas. These findings underscore the importance of targeted investment in scientific research, not only to amplify the individual impact of researchers but also to drive the scientific and technological advancement of the country. Therefore, policymakers and supporting institutions must design and implement more effective infrastructures and policies that promote innovative research, particularly in strategic fields. Expanding financial support for research can help improve Iran's international scientific standing, stimulate economic growth, foster technological innovation, and address societal challenges, thereby reinforcing the central role of research in national development. Finally, the study emphasizes the importance of balanced funding strategies, suggesting that strategic investments in both high-impact projects and the broader distribution of resources among elite researchers can jointly enhance the nation's overall scientific capacity. As global science becomes increasingly competitive, ensuring that the top 2 percent of Iranian scientists are equipped with sufficient and well-targeted financial resources will be critical to maintaining their contributions to global research. Such support is associated with advancing national interests in science and technology and strengthening Iran’s position in international academic collaborations and scientific diplomacy.

Keywords

Funding

Iran's top 2% scientists

Strategic technologies

Citation

International collaborations

Scientific impact

Subjects

Assessment and Evaluation of Science, Technology and Innovation

اشرفی، ف. (1391). بررسی و تحلیل نظام فعلی تخصیص مالی پژوهش کشور و ارائه پیشنهاداتی برای ساماندهی، پویاسازی و تسهیل آن [پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد منتشر نشده]. دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده مدیریت.https://ut.ac.ir/fa/thesis/30591

بختیارینژاد، ف.، و شیخان، ن. (1398). بررسی روشهای حمایتی از تولید علم و توسعه فناوری در حوزههای فنی و مهندسی. ترویج علم، 10(۲)، ۴۹-۸۳. https://www.popscijournal.ir/article_107019.html

بندریان، ر. (1398). تبیین مدل مدیریت راهبردی پژوهش و فناوری در سازمانهای حمایت کننده از پژوهش و فناوری؛ مطالعه موردی. فصلنامه مجلس و راهبرد، 26(97)، 107-136.

https://nashr.majles.ir/article_309.html

پاکزاد، م.، کاظمی، م.، قائمپناه، ع.، جمعه، ا.، و رزمی، آ. (1394). بررسی کارکرد سیاست هزینهکرد درصدی از اعتبارات دستگاههای اجرایی در پژوهش و توسعه و آسیب‌شناسی آن. رهیافت، 25(58)، 69-84.

https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13567.html

سازمان برنامه و بودجه. (1402). لایحه برنامه هفتم توسعه (1402-1406). سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور. https://rc.majlis.ir/rc-assets/uploads/af581c2cd91cf91dcd14d79c1c8aa5b6.pdf

ستوده، ه.، و امیدی، م. (1395). بررسی نقش اعتبارات پژوهشی داخلی و خارجی در بهبود اثرگذاری پژوهشی: نمونه مورد مطالعه تولیدات علمی ایران در نمایه گسترش یافته علوم در بازه زمانی 2008 تا 2011. مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات، 8(2)، 45-66. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2016.11639

شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. (1389). سند نقشه جامع علمی کشور. شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. بازیابی شده در ۲۵ اسفند، ۱۴۰۳، از https://qavanin.ir/Law/TreeText/?IDS=17517046340393698074

شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. (1396). سند جامع روابط علمی بین‌المللی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. بازیابی شده در ۲۵ اسفند، ۱۴۰۳، از https://davoudabadi.ir/page/89317426

طهمورثی، ن.، نوروزی، ع.، و صبوری، ع. (1400). تحلیل روابط بین ویژگیهای مقالههای نویسندگان یک درصد برتر ایرانی با تأثیر استنادی و اجتماعی آنها. رهیافت، 31(3)، 73-94.

https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2022.11091.1316

عباسی تقیدیزج، ر. (1398). تحلیل تطبیقی - کیفی عوامل مؤثر بر تولید علم در سطح کلان. جامعهشناسی کاربردی، 30(1)، 122-105. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2018.109889.1326

قاسمینیک، ز.، و گزنی، ع. (1398). تأثیر حمایتهای مالی بر اثرگذاری پژوهش: مطالعه موردی مقالات بینالمللی و استنادهای ایران. پژوهش‌نامه علمسنجی، 5(1)، 85-۹۸. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2018.697

کمانی، م.، و منصوری، ع. (۱۴۰۳). تحلیل وضعیت همکاری دانشگاه و صنعت از بعد حمایت مالی. پژوهشنامه علم‌سنجی، 5(1)، ۱۳۸-۱۱۵. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2023.17457.1654

مؤسسه استنادی و پایش علم و فناوری جهان اسلام. (1402). گزارش پژوهشگران ایرانی پراستناد دو درصد برتر دنیا دوره یک ساله: استنادات سال 2022. مؤسسه استنادی و پایش علم و فناوری جهان اسلام. بازیابی شده در ۱۶ مهر، 1402، از https://isc.ac/file/download/page/658c07b6aa5d7-.pdf

مصطفوی، ا.، و آژ، م. (1402). بررسی رابطه همکاریهای علمی بینالمللی و دریافت استناد مقالات پراستناد و داغ پژوهشگران ایرانی در پایگاه وب آو ساینس. پژوهش‌نامه علمسنجی، 9(1)، 19-42.

https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.13871.1477

نفیسی، غ.، طایی، ح.، آراسته، ح.، و قورچیان، ن. (1400). شناسایی و رتبهبندی روشهای تأمین مالی مؤثر بر عملکرد مالی دانشگاهها. فصلنامه رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی، 15(3)، 199-225.

https://search.isc.ac/dl/search/defaultta.aspx?DTC=8&DC=1305503

نوروزی چاکلی، ع. (1390). آشنایی با علم‌سنجی (مبانی، مفاهیم، روابط و ریشه‌ها). سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب دانشگاهی در علوم اسلامی و انسانی (سمت).

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=RD8SEJYAAAAJ&citation_for_view=RD8SEJYAAAAJ:nVrZBo8bIpAC

نوروزی چاکلی، ع.، و مددی، ز. (1394). هزینه‌کرد تحقیق و توسعه و رتبه علمی: آیا کشورهای با هزینه‌کرد بیشتر در تحقیق و توسعه، در رتبه‌های علمی بهتری قرار دارند؟. تحقیقات اطلاعرسانی و کتابخانههای عمومی، 21(1)، 191-177.

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=RD8SEJYAAAAJ&cstart=100&pagesize=100&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=RD8SEJYAAAAJ:OcBU2YAGkTUC

Aagaard, K., Kladakis, A., & Nielsen, M. W. (2020). Concentration or dispersal of Research funding? Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00002

Abbasi Taghidizaj, R. (2019). competitive qualitative analysis influence factors on science production at the macro level. Journal of Applied Sociology, 30(1), 105-122.

https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2018.109889.1326 [In Persian].

Ashrafi, F. (2012). A Study and Analysis of the Current Research Funding Allocation System in Iran and Proposals for Its Organization, Revitalization, and Facilitation [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. University of Tehran, Faculty of Management.

https://ut.ac.ir/fa/thesis/30591 [In Persian].

Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—an international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822-834.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003

Bakhtiari-Nehjad, F., & Sheikhan, N. (2020). Scientific development of iran in the field of technical and engineering. Journal of the Popularization of Science, 10(2), 49-83.

https://www.popscijournal.ir/article_107019.html [In Persian].

Bandarian, R. (2019). Explaining the strategic research and technology management model in supportive organizations of research and technology: Case study. Majlis and Rahbord, 26(97), 107-136. https://nashr.majles.ir/article_309.html [In Persian].

Benowitz, S. (1997). Early-career Awards Giving New Researchers a Leg Up. Scientist Inc. Retrieved June 12, 2024, from https://www.the-scientist.com/early-career-awards-giving-new-researchers-a-leg-up-57470

Bloch, C., & Sørensen, M.P. (2015). The size of research funding: trends and implications. Science and Public Policy, 42(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu019

Chudnovsky, D., López, A., Rossi, M. A., & Ubfal, D. (2008). Money for science? The impact of research grants on academic output. Fiscal Studies, 29(1), 75-87.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2008.00069.x

Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2016). How to boost scientific production? A statistical analysis of research funding and other influencing factors. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1093–1116.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1825-x

Entradas, M., & Santos, J.M. (2021). returns of research funding are maximised in media visibility for excellent institutes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, Article number 216, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00884-w

Garcia, C. E., & Sanz-Menendez, L. (2005). Competition for funding as an indicator of research competitiveness. Scientometrics, 64(3), 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0251-x

Ghaseminik, Z., & Gazni, A. (2019). The influence of funding on the scientific impact of research: The case of Iranian international papers and citations. Scientometrics Research Journal, 5(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2018.697 [In Persian].

Heyard, R. & Hottenrott, H. (2021). The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF research grants. Himanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, Article number 217, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00891-x

Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007

Iacob, O.C, Chiotan, R.A, Ganea, o., & Ciobanu, Gh. (2023). Research funding policies and opportunities in EU countries in the context of new development opportunities. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(3), 265-277.

https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n3p265

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2023, October 4). October 2023 Data-Update for Updated Science-Wide Author Databases of Standardized Citation Indicators. Elsevier. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.17632/btchxktzyw.6

Ioannidis, J.P.A., Boyack, K.W., & Baas, J. (2023). Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators. PLoS Biology, 18(10), e3000918.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000918

Islamic World Science and Technology Monitoring and Citation Institute (ISC). (2023). Report on the Top 2% Most-Cited Iranian Researchers (One-Year Period: 2022 Citations). Islamic World Science and Technology Monitoring and Citation Institute (ISC). Retrieved October 7, 2024, from https://isc.ac/file/download/page/658c07b6aa5d7-.pdf [In Persian].

Kamani, M., & Mansouri, A. (2024). Analysis of the state of cooperation between university and industry from the aspect of financial support. Scientometrics Research Journal, 10(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2023.17457.1654 [In Persian].

Kumari, R., Uddin, A., Lee, B., & Choi, K. (2020). Analyzing the factors influencing the waiting time to first citation and long-term impact of publications. Journal of Scientometric Research, 9(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.9.2.16.

Lee, Y.H. (2021). Determinants of research productivity in Korean universities: The role of research funding. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(3), 1462-1486.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09817-2

Mostafavi, I., & Azh, M. (2023). Investigating the relationship between international scientific collaboration and citations of highly cited and hot papers of the Iranian researchers in the Web of Science database. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9(1), 19-42.

https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.13871.1477 [In Persian].

Nafisi, Gh., Taee, H., Arasteh, H.G., & Ghourchian, N. (2021). Identify and rank financing methods that affect the financial performance of universities. Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration, 15(3), 199-225.

https://search.isc.ac/dl/search/defaultta.aspx?DTC=8&DC=1305503 [In Persian].

Nicholson, J. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Research grants: Conform and be funded. Nature, 492(7427), 34-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/492034a

Noorhidawati, A., Yanti Idaya Aspura, M.K., Zahila, M.N., & Abrizah, A. (2017). Characteristics of Malaysian highly cited papers. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 22(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol22no2.6

Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2011). Introduction To Scientometrics (Fondations, Concepts, Relations & Origins). The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Islamic Sciences and the Humanities (SAMT).

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=RD8SEJYAAAAJ&citation_for_view=RD8SEJYAAAAJ:nVrZBo8bIpAC [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A., & Madadi, Z. (2015). Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D indicators and scientific ranking: Do countries that better spend on research and development have better scientific rankings? Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 21(1), 177-191. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=RD8SEJYAAAAJ&cstart=100&pagesize=100&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=RD8SEJYAAAAJ:OcBU2YAGkTUC [In Persian].

Noroozi Chakoli, A., Noroozi Chakoli, S., & Chehrenegar, L. (2023, September 27-29). Is there relationship between cultural-economic indicators and the scientific status of countries? Analysis of western and central asian countries using a neural network algorithm [Conference Paper Preprint]. 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI, ENID 2023), Leiden, Netherlands.

https://doi.org/10.55835/644280742de665ded8bb1068

Pakzad, M., Kazemi, M., Ghaempanah, A., Jomeh, A., & Razmi, A. (2015). An investigation of the performance of the policy of spending a percentage of the government agencies’ funds on research and development. Rahyaft, 25(58), 69-84.

https://rahyaft.nrisp.ac.ir/article_13567.html [In Persian].

Plan and Budget Organization. (2023). Draft of the Seventh Development Plan (2023–2027). Plan and Budget Organization of Iran. Plan and Budget Organization. https://rc.majlis.ir/rc-assets/uploads/af581c2cd91cf91dcd14d79c1c8aa5b6.pdf [In Persian].

Shelton, R.D. (2008). Relations between national research investment and publication output: application to an american paradox. Scientometrics, 74(2), 191–205.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0212-2

Sotudeh, H., & Omidi, M. (2017). Investigating the role of domestic and foreign research credits in improving research effectiveness: The case study of iran’s scientific productions in the expanded profile of sciences in the period from 2008 to 2011. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 8(18), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2016.11639

[In Persian].

Stanford University. (2023). World’s Top 2% Scientists List. Retrieved June 23, 2025, from: https://top2percentscientists.com/top-2-percent-scientists-by-stanford/

STEP. (2024). Strategic Technologies: Advancing Digital, Environmentally Friendly and Biotechnology in NRW. Retrieved August 19, 2024, from

https://www.efre.nrw/en/understand/main-topics/strategic-technologies

Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2010). Comprehensive Scientific Map of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://qavanin.ir/Law/TreeText/?IDS=17517046340393698074 [In Persian].

Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2017). Comprehensive Document on the International Scientific Relations of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. Retrieved March 15, 2025, from https://davoudabadi.ir/page/89317426

[In Persian].

Tahmouresi, N., Noruzi, A., & Saboury, A. A. (2021). Exploring the relationships between the characteristics of papers published by ohe Iranian top one percent researchers and their citation and social impacts. Rahyaf, 31(3), 73-94.

https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2022.11091.1316 [In Persian].

Thelwall, M., & Maflahi, N. (2020). Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(8), 968-978. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24315

Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Abdoli, M., Stuart, E., Makita, M., Font-Julián, C. I., Wilson, P., & Levitt, J. (2023). Is research funding always beneficial? A cross-disciplinary analysis of U.K. research 2014–20. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(2), 501–534.

https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00254

Ye, F.Y. (2007). A quantitative relationship between Per Capita GDP and scientometric criteria. Scientometrics, 71(3), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1678-z

Zacharewicz, T., Pavón, N.P., Martos, L.A.P., & Lepori, B. (2023). Do funding modes matter? A multilevel analysis of funding allocation mechanisms on university research performance. Research Evaluation, 32(3), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvad023

Zhao, D. (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84(2), 293-306.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0191-y