Scientometrics Research Journal

Scientometrics Research Journal

Analysis of the Knowledge Structure, Thematic Evolution, and Emerging and Future Research Directions in User Interface Design for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Decision-Making Dashboards: A Scientometric Study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 B.Sc. Student in Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran; And Visiting B.Sc. Student, Facul-ty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Purpose: The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizational decision-making environments has intensified concerns about transparency, interpretability, and user trust. As complex machine learning models increasingly support managerial and policy decisions, the need for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has become essential to ensure that decision-makers understand and appropriately utilize algorithmic outputs. Decision dashboards have emerged as key interfaces through which AI-driven insights are delivered to managers and analysts. Despite their growing importance, the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of XAI within decision dashboard design have not yet been systematically examined. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the knowledge structure, conceptual foundations, and thematic development of research on Explainable Artificial Intelligence in decision dashboards. Employing scientometric techniques, the study identifies core research themes, emerging trends, and structural relationships shaping this rapidly evolving field. It also highlights how technical advancements in AI intersect with human-centered design, decision support systems, and visualization approaches in explainable decision dashboards.
Methodology: This study employs advanced bibliometric and network analysis techniques within a scientometric framework to map the intellectual landscape of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) research in decision dashboards. Data were collected from the Scopus and Web of Science databases to ensure comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed literature. Following the PRISMA protocol for systematic screening and refinement, an initial dataset of 942 records was identified. After applying inclusion criteria and limiting the corpus to original research articles, 251 records from Scopus and 112 from Web of Science were retained. Duplicate and irrelevant records were removed, resulting in a final dataset of 269 articles. Data standardization and descriptive bibliometric analyses were conducted using the Bibliometrix package and the Biblioshiny interface. These tools facilitated the examination of publication trends, leading journals, and author productivity patterns, including the application of Bradford’s and Lotka’s laws. To explore the conceptual structure of the field, keyword co-occurrence network analysis was performed using VOSviewer. Network, density, and overlay visualizations were generated to identify thematic clusters, intellectual linkages, and temporal changes in research topics. Additionally, thematic evolution mapping and logistic growth modeling were applied to examine the developmental trajectory of the field.
Findings: The findings indicate that research on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in decision dashboards is evolving from a purely technical, algorithm-centered domain toward a multidimensional, interdisciplinary knowledge structure. Co-occurrence analysis reveals that the intellectual core of the field is organized around three central concepts: explainable AI, decision making, and deep learning. These themes form the primary hub of the conceptual network, suggesting that explainability is increasingly recognized as a fundamental component of intelligent decision support systems rather than merely a supplementary feature of machine learning models. The results also identify several interconnected thematic clusters, including human ethical considerations, technical methodological development, applied operational contexts, cognitive autonomous systems, and emerging specialized topics. This structure reflects the convergence of two complementary research paradigms: algorithmic performance and engineering efficiency on one hand, and human understanding, trust, and accountability on the other. Density visualization confirms that the highest concentration of research lies at the intersection of explainable AI, decision-making, and deep learning, underscoring the central role of deep learning technologies in the field. However, these technologies require integration with interpretability mechanisms and user interface design to be effective in decision dashboards. Overlay visualization further indicates a thematic transition over time. Earlier research primarily focused on classical machine learning techniques such as neural networks and support vector machines. In contrast, recent studies increasingly emphasize visual deep learning, visualization techniques, trust, and intelligent decision support systems. Another key finding is that concepts like trust and visualization have evolved from peripheral topics to integral components of explainable AI (XAI) systems, highlighting the growing importance of user comprehension and interaction in AI-supported decision-making processes. Logistic growth modeling also indicates that the field is still in a rapid expansion phase and has not yet reached scientific saturation.
Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the research landscape of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in decision dashboards is shifting from a technology-centered paradigm toward a human- and decision-centered paradigm. Explainability is increasingly understood not only as a technical capability that clarifies algorithmic outputs but also as a cognitive bridge between complex AI systems and human decision-makers. The findings highlight that the effectiveness of AI-enabled decision dashboards depends not only on predictive accuracy but also on the systems' ability to communicate reasoning processes in an interpretable and trustworthy manner. Consistent with previous studies, the practical value of explainable AI emerges when explanations enhance transparency, foster user trust, and support informed decision-making in complex environments. By mapping the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of this interdisciplinary domain, the study provides insights into its conceptual foundations and future research directions. In particular, it emphasizes the importance of integrating deep learning technologies with explainability mechanisms, visualization techniques, and human-centered interface design to develop effective decision dashboards.
Keywords
Subjects

نوروزی چاکلی، ع.، نوروزی چاکلی، س.، و نوروزی، ح. (۱۴۰۳). شناسایی ابعاد، چالش‌ها، معیارها، شاخص‌ها و الزامات مطرح در چرخه داوری علمی ارزیابانه عملیاتی و ارائه چارچوبی برای داوری آثار علمی در کشور [گزارش طرح پژوهشی]. وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، معاونت پژوهش و فناوری. بازیابی شده در اردیبهشت ۲۵، ۱۴۰۵، از https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32964269
Akkem, Y., Biswas, S. K., & Aruna, V. (2026). Deciphering the black box: Interactive crop recommendation system using Explainable AI with visualisation dashboards. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 38(2), 219–259.
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
Alonso, J. M., Castiello, C., & Mencar, C. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of the explainable artificial intelligence research field. In J. Medina, M. Ojeda-Aciego, J. L. Verdegay, D. A. Pelta, I. P. Cabrera, B. Bouchon-Meunier, & R. R. Yager (Eds.), Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 853, pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_1
Ammar, O. H., Rejeb, A., & Rejeb, K. (2026). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in finance: A bibliometric review. Finance Research Open, 100131.
Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M. (2021). Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(5), e1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1424
Barredo, A. A., Del Ser, J., Gil-Lopez, S., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Bennetot, A., Chatila, R., Tabik, S., Garcia, S., Molina, D., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Scientometrics in a changing research landscape. EMBO Reports, 15(12), 1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608
Bradford, S. C. (1985). Sources of information on specific subjects. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158501000406
Buchanan, B. G., & Shortliffe, E. H. (1984). Rule based expert systems: the Mycin experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (the Addison-Wesley series in artificial intelligence). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
Buñay-Guisñan, P., Lara, J. A., Cano, A., Cerezo, R., & Romero, C. (2026). Towards accessible AI for addressing students’ academic dropout: An auto machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-025-01278-4
Chen, X.-Q., Ma, C.-Q., Ren, Y.-S., Lei, Y.-T., Huynh, N. Q. A., & Narayan, S. (2023). Explainable artificial intelligence in finance: A bibliometric review. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104145.
Confalonieri, R., Coba, L., Wagner, B., & Besold, T. R. (2021). A historical perspective of explainable artificial intelligence. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(1), e1391. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1424
Daovisan, H. (2026). Explainable artificial intelligence 5.0 for emerging technologies of responsible innovation. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 6, 595.
Fouad, S., Hakobyan, L., Ihongbe, I. E., Kavakli-Thorne, M., Atkins, S., & Bhatia, B. (2026). Human-centered user interface design for explainable AI in chest radiology: A multi-phase co-design approach. IEEE Access, 14, 12498-12513.
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2018). A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009
Haghani, M. (2023). What makes an informative and publication-worthy scientometric analysis of literature: A guide for authors, reviewers and editors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100956
Hunsicker, T., Schulz, A., Leist, R. A., Kiefer, S., Boden, K. T., Rothaus, K., König, C. J., & Langer, M. (2026). Efficiency Pitfalls of Explainable AI in Clinical Diagnostic and Treatment Human-AI Workflows. Human Factors, 00187208261443764.
Ivancheva, L. (2008). Scientometrics today: A methodological overview. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2(2), 47–56.
Kim, M., Kim, S., Kim, J., Song, T. J., & Kim, Y. (2024). Do stakeholder needs differ? - Designing stakeholder-tailored Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 181, 103160.
Koutsoupias, N., & Nosios, M. (2026). Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Social Sciences and Humanities: A systematic bibliometric analysis. Engineering Proceedings, 124(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124113
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203
Lotka, A. J., & Bradford, S. C. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Information Science, 10(4), 317–323. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203
Mahanta, P., Bhattacharya, M., & Habermeier, J. (2026). Balancing AI complexity with usability: a study of AI-based UX patterns in business applications. Information Technology & People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2025-1115
Marciano, J. M. V., Machado, V. P., & de Araújo, A. H. M. (2026). Bibliometric Review of the Ethical and Legal Perspectives of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Health [Preprint]. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9448591/v1
Miller, T. (2019). But why? Understanding explainable artificial intelligence. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 25(3), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313107
Nalela, P., Rao, D. P., & Rao, P. V. (2026). Explainable AI for predicting mortality risk in metastatic cancer: Retrospective cohort study using the memorial sloan Mettering-Metastatic Dataset. JMIR Cancer, 12, e74196. https://doi.org/10.2196/74196
Noroozi Chakoli, A., Noroozi Chakoli, S., & Norouzi, H. (2024). Identifying the Dimensions, Challenges, Criteria, Indicators, and Requirements of the Scholarly Peer Review Process and Proposing a Framework for the Evaluation of Scientific Works in Iran [Research project]. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran, Deputy of Research and Technology. Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32964269
      [In Persian].
Pereira, A., & Maciel, A. M. A. (2026). Integration of an explainable dashboard to enhance autoML transparency. In A. Rocha, F. G. Penalvo, C. J. Costa, & R. Goncalves (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI 2025, Vol. 2 (Vol. 1717, Numbers 20th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies-CISTI, pp. 725–736). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10721-3_62
Prasad, P. W. C., Sayeed, M. S., Nguyen, D.-M., Hutabarat, D. P., & Mohiuddin, G. M. (2026). Explainable AI: Enhancing decision-making in the detection of cyber threats. Frontiers in Computer Science, 8, 1762332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2026.1762332
Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., & Treiblmaier, H. (2026). Explainable artificial intelligence in finance: a bibliometric and topic modeling analysis using BERTopic. Quality & Quantity, 1–25.
Rezaeian, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Asan, O. (2026). Explainability and AI confidence in clinical decision support systems: Effects on trust, diagnostic performance, and cognitive load in breast cancer care. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 42(6), 4477–4497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2539458
Russo, M., & Vistocco, D. (2026). Explainable Artificial Intelligence through the lens of bibliometric citation analysis. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 42(3), e70091. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.70091
Shiddik, M. A. B. (2026). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: current landscape, challenges, and future directions. Health Science Reports, 9(3), e72172.
Talmoudi, R., & Choukir, J. (2026). From predictive analytics to Explainable AI in higher education: A bibliometric mapping. Qubahan Academic Journal, 6(2), 437–461.
Torbati, A. S., & Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2013). Empirical examination of Lotka"s law for applied mathematics. Life Science Journal, 10(SUPPL. 5).
Tveita, L. J., & Hustad, E. (2025). Benefits and challenges of Artificial Intelligence in public sector: A literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 256, 222–229.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0010-7