Scientometrics Research Journal

Scientometrics Research Journal

Bibliometric Analysis and Co-word Mapping: The Field of Knowledge Graphs

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Ameneh Shenavar 1
Saeed Rezaei Sharifabadi 2
Molouksadat Hosseini Beheshti 3
Akram Fathian Dastgerdi 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Faculty of Educational and Psychology, Alzahra Universi-ty, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD in Linguistics, Associated Professor, Terminology & Ontology Research Group, Iranian Research Institue for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Islamic World Science and Technology Monitoring and Citation Institute (ISC), Shiraz, Iran
10.22070/rsci.2025.20795.1838
Abstract
Purpose: The rapid expansion of research in the field of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) over the past decade has positioned The field as a dynamic area at the intersection of computer science, artificial intelligence. Following Google’s introduction of the KG in 2012, scholars and industry stakeholders have increasingly explored the conceptualization, development, and application of KGs across a wide range of disciplines. KGs, as structured representations of entities, relationships, and semantic information, enable machines to process heterogeneous data in a contextually meaningful and interpretable manner. Beyond traditional knowledge representation, new directions such as ontology modeling, semantic web integration, and graph neural networks (GNNs) are driving innovation. Despite these advances, large-scale, systematic, and global evaluations of the intellectual structure, collaboration patterns, and thematic clusters in the field of KGs remain limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the evolution of research in the field of KGs between 2013 and 2025 using bibliometric and scientometric approaches. The overarching purpose is to uncover research trends, identify leading contributors and institutions, explore co-authorship and co-word networks, and highlight conceptual clusters shaping the KG landscape.
Methodology: This applied descriptive bibliometric study was conducted using the co-word analysis method. Data were collected from the Scopus citation database, covering outputs published between January 2013 to July 2025 that included the keyword "knowledge graph" in titles, abstracts, or author keywords. Keyword normalization reduced 19,141 initial keywords to 19,058 unique terms. After removing duplicates, excluding irrelevant records, and normalizing author, institution, and country names, a curated dataset of 9,000 articles was obtained. To enhance the accuracy of the analysis, keywords and knowledge graph-related concepts were carefully categorized and standardized. Data analysis and visualization were performed using VOSviewer, mapping collaboration networks and co-occurrence clusters. The study examines temporal publication and citation trends, prolific countries, funding bodies, influential authors, highly cited works, and thematic clusters, with particular focus on knowledge graph embedding, recommender systems, semantic web applications, and natural language processing.
Findings: Results indicate that research in the field of knowledge graphs (KGs) has grown substantially, reaching a publication peak in 2024 with 2,541 articles and 33,701 citations. Asia contributes the majority of publications (83.7%), with China accounting for 6,889 articles (76.5% of the total). The United States ranks second with 987 publications, followed by the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia. This trend reflects strong investment by Chinese funding bodies—particularly the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the National Key Research and Development Program. Leading publication outlets include IEEE Access (345 articles), Knowledge-Based Systems (293 articles), and Applied Sciences Switzerland (248 articles), with many top journals in the Q1 quartile of Scopus. At the author level, Markus Kraft (University of Cambridge) leads with 48 publications, while Chinese researchers dominate the top ten. Co-authorship analysis revealed seven author clusters (42 nodes, 62 links) and broad participation from 136 countries, with China, the US, and Germany serving as central hubs of international collaboration. Co-word analysis identified six major clusters, including graph neural networks, deep learning, ontology, KG embeddings, question answering, and large language models (LLMs). Highly cited works include comprehensive surveys on KGs published between 2017 and 2022 in leading computing journals, which have shaped the understanding of KG construction, refinement, and applications. . Emerging contributions, such as roadmaps on unifying LLMs and KGs, along with applications in digital twin systems and scientific entity recognition, illustrate the field’s ongoing shift toward integrating advanced AI paradigms.
Conclusion: The bibliometric analysis reveals that research in the field of knowledge graphs (KGs) has rapidly emerged as a dynamic interdisciplinary area, characterized by strong publication growth, a high geographic concentration in Asia, and expanding international collaboration networks. Chinese institutions and scholars play a leading role, supported by significant policy and funding initiatives, while Europe and North America remain important contributors. Thematic clustering highlights both the consolidation of established domains—such as ontology, the semantic web, and knowledge representation—and expansion into cutting-edge areas, including graph neural networks, embeddings, digital twins, recommender systems, and large language model (LLM) integration. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of the intellectual structure and evolving dynamics of research in KGs, offering valuable insights for future studies. Scholars can use this mapping to identify promising areas of inquiry, foster international collaborations, and navigate the funding and publication landscape. Ultimately, KGs play a pivotal role in advancing intelligent systems, semantic technologies, and digital transformation across sectors such as healthcare, education, natural language processing, and recommender systems. The integration of bibliometric analysis with scientometric evaluation further underscores the maturity of this field and its potential to shape next-generation knowledge-driven applications.
Keywords
Knowledge Graphs (KGs)
Bibliometric analysis
Co-word analysis
Co-authorship network
Scopus
Scientometrics
Subjects
احمدی، س. م.، سلیمانپور، ج.، و پورحسین گیلاکجانی، ع. (1401). مروری بر شاخص‌های جدید علم‌سنجی. نشاء علم، 13(1)، 18–25.
    https://www.sciencecultivation.ir/article_703840_f4ce22752d021e265716dbd290e4a600.pdf
شفیعیان، ا.، محمدی، ا.، قنبر، احمدپور داریانی، م.. خاندوزی، س.، و پاداش، ح. (1400). شاکله دانش در نظریه توانمندسازی کارآفرینانه فقرا: یک تحلیل وسیع علم‌سنجی. توسعه ‌کارآفرینی، ۱۴(1)، 99-118. 
    https://doi.org/10.22059/JED.2021.315258.653536
میرعرب، ع. (1404). تحلیل و مصورسازی تولیدات علمی حوزه هوش‌مصنوعی توضیح‌پذیر و گراف دانش در پایگاه استنادی وب‌آو‌ساینس در بازه زمانی 2024-2020. مطالعات‌ کاربردی‌ علم‌سنجی، 2(1)، ۵۸-۸۱.
    https://apss.qom.ac.ir/article_3619.html?lang=en
میرعرب، ع. و دارستانی فراهانی، ف. (1403). ارائه الگویی برای مدل زبانی بزرگ توضیح‌پذیر علوم اسلامی - انسانی مبتنی بر گراف دانش. علوم و فنون مدیریت اطلاعات، 10(4)، 7-38.  
    https://stim.qom.ac.ir/article_3085.html?lang=en  
ناصری جزه، م.، طباطباییان، س. ح. ا.، و فاتح راد، م. (1391). ترسیم نقشه دانش مدیریت فناوری در ایران با هدف کمک به سیاست‌گذاری‌دانش در این حوزه. سیاست ‌علم ‌ و فناوری، 5(3)، 45-72.  
    https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12864.html
نصیرزاده، الف. (1402). طراحی گراف دانش با الگوریتم‌های داده محور برای بهینه‌سازی تطبیق افراد و مشاغل و رتبه‌بندی مهارت‌ها. مطالعات ‌منابع انسانی، 13(3)، 166-193.
    https://www.jhrs.ir/?_action=article&au=1395045   
وحیدی‌پور، م .، دانشمند، د.، و ظریف، م . (۱۴۰۴). مرور روش‌های جاسازی گراف‎های دانش. محاسبات نرم، ۱۴(۲)، ۲-۱۹. https://doi.org/10.22052/scj.2024.254464.1224
هرندی، ع.، و محبی، ع. (1404). تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی چابکی استراتژیک با بهره‌گیری از تحلیل همرخدادی واژگان. مدیریت‌بازرگانی، 17(1)، 1–22. https://doi.org/10.22059/JIBM.2024.372935.4756
Abu-Salih, B. (2021). Domain-specific knowledge graphs: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 185, 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103076
Ahmadi, S. M., Soleimanpour, J., Gilakjani, A. P. (2023). An overview of new scientometric indicators. Science Cultivation, 13(1), 18- 25.
      https://www.sciencecultivation.ir/article_703840_f4ce22752d021e265716dbd290e4a600.pdf
      [In Persian].
Chaudhri, V. K., Baru, C., Chittar, N., Dong, X. L., Genesereth, M. R., Hendler, J. A., Kalyanpur, A., Lenat, D. B., Sequeda, J., Vrandečić, D., & Wang, K. (2022). Knowledge graphs: Introduction, history, and perspectives. AI Magazine, 43(1), 17–29.
      https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12033
Chen, P., Lu, Y., Zheng, V. W., Chen, X., & Yang, B. (2018). Knowedu: A system to construct knowledge graph for education. IEEE Access, 6, 31553-31563.
      https://scholar.google.de/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=vi&user=kAq_-McAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=kAq_-McAAAAJ:-uzm3Y7AvW0C
Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2020). A structural topic modeling-based bibliometric study of sentiment analysis literature. Cognitive Computation, 12(6), 1097-1129.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09745-1 
Chen, X., Chen, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Li, J. (2016). Mapping the research trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia computer science, 91, 547-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.140 
Chen, X., Xie, H., Li, Z., & Cheng, G. (2021). Topic analysis and development in knowledge graph research: A bibliometric review on three decades. Neurocomputing, 461, 497-515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.098 
Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Cheng, J., Zhao, X., & Duan, Z. (2020). Knowledge graph completion: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 192435-192456.
      https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3030076 
Cheng, D., Yang, F., Xiang, S., & Liu, J. (2022). Financial time series forecasting with multi-modality graph neural network. Pattern Recognition, 121, 108218.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108218 
Cui, J., & Yu, S. (2019). Fostering deeper learning in a flipped classroom: Effects of knowledge graphs versus concept maps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2308-2328.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12841 
Ehrlinger, L., & Wöß, W. (2016). Towards a definition of knowledge graphs. In M. Martin, M. Cuquet, E. Folmer (Eds.), Joint Proceedings of the Posters and Demos Track of 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems- SEMANTiCS2016 and 1st International Workshop on Semantic Change & Evolving Semantics (SuCCESS16) (Vol. 1695, pp. 2–8). (CEUR Workshop Proceedings). Sun SITE Central Europe (CEUR), Technical University of Aachen (RWTH). https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84992411277
European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2019). Future of scholarly publishing and scholarly communication: Report of the Expert Group to the European Commission. European Union, Publications Office.
      https://doi.org/10.2777/836532
Fadel, K. (2021). Data Science with Scholarly Knowledge Graphs [Unpublished master’s dissertation]. University of Mannheim. https://doi.org/10.15488/11535
Feng, J., Zhang, Y. Q., & Zhang, H. (2017). Improving the co-word analysis method based on semantic distance. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1521-1531.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2286-1 
Fensel, D., Şimşek, U., Angele, K., Huaman, E., Kärle, E., Panasiuk, O., Toma, I., Umbrich, J., & Wahler, A. (2020). Introduction: What is a knowledge graph? In D. Fensel, U. Şimşek, K. Angele, E. Huaman, E. Kärle, O. Panasiuk, I. Toma, J. Umbrich, & A. Wahler (Eds.), Knowledge Graphs: Methodology, Tools and Selected Use Cases (pp. 1–10). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6_1
Hao, X., Ji, Z., Li, X., Yin, L., Liu, L., Sun, M., Liu, Y., & Yang, R. (2021). Construction and application of a knowledge graph. Remote Sensing, 13(13), 2511.
      https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132511
Harandi, A., & Mohebbi, A. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of strategic agility using word co-occurrence analysis. Journal of Business Management, 17(1), 1-22.
      https://doi.org/10.22059/JIBM.2024.372935.4756 [In Persian].
Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., d’Amato, C., de Melo, G., Gutierrez, C., Kirrane, S., Labra Gayo, J. E., Navigli, R., Neumaier, S., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C., Polleres, A., Rashid, S. M., Rula, A., Schmelzeisen, L., Sequeda, J., Staab, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2021). Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), Article 71.
      https://doi.org/10.1145/3447772
Hosseini, E., Shahbazi, A., & Dehbozorgi, A. (2025). Topical evolution and thematic progression of research frontiers: The field of knowledge graphs. Knowledge Organization, 52(1), 39497. https://doi.org/10.31083/ko39497 
Issa, S., Adekunle, O., Hamdi, F., Cherfi, S. S. S., Dumontier, M., & Zaveri, A. (2021). Knowledge graph completeness: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9, 31322-31339. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3056622 
Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2021). A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(2), 494-514. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2021.3070843 
Kalantari, A., Kamsin, A., Kamaruddin, H. S., Ale Ebrahim, N., Gani, A., Ebrahimi, A., & Shamshirband, S. (2017). A bibliometric approach to tracking big data research trends. Journal of Big Data, 4(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-017-0088-1 
Khasseh, A. A., Soheili, F., Moghaddam, H. S., & Chelak, A. M. (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrics: A co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.02.001 
Li, J., Wang, X., Guo, R., Li, Z., Lv, H., & Wang, Y. (2025). Research progress and trends of insect high-temperature stress: insights from bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Insect Science, 5, 1625155. https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2025.1625155 
Li, N., Kramer, J., Gordon, P., & Agogino, A. (2018). Co-author network analysis of human-centered design for development. Design Science, 4, e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.1 
Li, X., & Lei, L. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of topic modeling studies (2000–2017). Journal of Information Science, 47(2), 161-175.
      https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519877049 
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166.
      https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166 
Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of computer-assisted English learning from 2001 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(14), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.24151 
Mirarab, A. (2025). Analysis and visualization of scientific studies in the field of explainable artificial intelligence and knowledge graph in the Web of Science Citation database from 2020 to 2024. Applied Scientometric Studies, 2(1), 58-81.
      https://apss.qom.ac.ir/article_3619.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Mirarab, A., & DarestaniFarahani, F. (2024). Explainable large language model for Islamic and humanities sciences based on knowledge graphs. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 10(4), 7-38. https://stim.qom.ac.ir/article_3085.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Naseri Jezeh, M., & Faateh Raad, M. (2012). Science mapping of management of technology in Iran: A tool for knowledge policy making. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 5(3), 45-72. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12864.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Nasirzadeh, E. (2023). Designing a knowledge graph with data-driven algorithms to optimize matching people and jobs and ranking skills. Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(3), 166-193. https://www.jhrs.ir/article_189966.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Paulheim, H. (2016). Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semantic Web: Interoperability, Usability, Applicability, 8(3), 489-508.
      https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-160218 
Peng, C., Xia, F., Naseriparsa, M., & Osborne, F. (2023). Knowledge graphs: Opportunities and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(11), 13071-13102.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10465-9 
Rizun, M. (2019). Knowledge graph application in education: A literature review. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 3(342), 7-19.
      https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.342.01 
Salatino, A. A., Mannocci, A., & Osborne, F. (2021). Detection, analysis, and prediction of research topics with scientific knowledge graphs. In Y. Manolopoulos, & T. Vergoulis (Eds.), Predicting the Dynamics of Research Impact (pp. 225–252). Springer.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86668-6_11
Santamaria, T., Tapia-Leon, M., & Chicaiza, J. (2021). Construction and leverage scientific knowledge graphs by means of semantic technologies. In M. Botto-Tobar, W. Zamora, J. Larrea Plúa, J. Bazurto Roldan, & A. Santamaría Philco (Eds.), Systems and Information Ssciences. ICCIS 2020. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 1273, pp. 455–466). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59194-6_37
Sawar, K., Mekani, L., Kallabat, A., Kato, D., & Potts, G. A. (2025). The 100 most cited articles in androgenetic alopecia: A bibliometric analysis. Medicine, 104(12), e41881.
      https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000041881 
Shafieian, A., Mohammadi Elyasi, G., Ahmadpour Dariyani, M., Khandoozi, S. E., & Padash, H. (2021). Body of knowledge in theory of entrepreneurial empowerment of the poor: An extensive scientometric analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(1), 99–118.
      https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2021.315258.653536 [In Persian].
Tiwari, S., Al-Aswadi, F. N., & Gaurav, D. (2021). Recent trends in knowledge graphs: theory and practice. Soft Computing, 25(13), 8337-8355.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05756-8 
Turki, H., Hadj Taieb, M. A., Ben Aouicha, M., Fraumann, G., Hauschke, C., & Heller, L. (2021). Enhancing knowledge graph extraction and validation from scholarly publications using bibliographic metadata. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 694307.
      https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.694307
Vahidipour, S. M., Daneshmand, D., and Zarif, M. A. (2026). A review of knowledge graph embedding methods. Soft Computing Journal, 14(2), 2-19.
      https://doi.org/10.22052/scj.2024.254464.1224 [In Persian].
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023, January 23). Vosviewer Manual: Manual for Vosviewer Version 1.6.19. Universiteit Leiden; CWTS Meaningful Metrics.
      https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.19.pdf
Wang, G., & He, J. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of recent developments and trends in knowledge graph research (2013–2022). IEEE Access, 12, 32005-32013.
      https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3370409 
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017). Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(12), 2724-2743. https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 
Wu, Z., & Jia, F. (2022). Construction and application of a major-specific knowledge graph based on big data in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(7), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i07.30405 
Xie, K., Jia, Q., Jing, M., Yu, Q., Yang, T., & Fan, R. (2021). Data analysis based on knowledge graph. In L. Barolli, M. Takizawa, T. Enokido, H. C. Chen, & K. Matsuo (Eds.), Advances on Broad-Band Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications. BWCCA 2020. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol 159, pp. 376–385). Springer.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61108-8_37
Yan, J., Wang, C., Cheng, W., Gao, M., & Zhou, A. (2018). A retrospective of knowledge graphs. Frontiers of Computer Science, 12(1), 55-74.
      https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5228-9 
Yang, L., Chen, Z., Liu, T., Gong, Z., Yu, Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 96(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0911-6