Knowledge Structure in Knowledge Discovery Patents: Visualization based on Co-word Analysis

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.S. in Scientometrics, The Academic Institute for Ethics and Education.

2 Associate Professor, Department of library and information science. Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study is to explain the structure of knowledge in the field of knowledge discovery using Co-word Analysis.
Methodology: Bibliometric methodology and social network analysis are used as the research methods. The research population consists of all keywords in 304 patents in the field of Knowledge Discovery (KD) (Reporting, knowledge discovery (KD) systems) during 1995-2014 extracted from USPTO.
Findings: Findings indicated that “System” and “Computer” are the most frequent keywords in Knowledge Discovery patents. Moreover, findings showed that “Computer***Apparatus” and “OLAP***OLAP Management” are highly frequent co-word pairs, respectively. The results of hierarchical clustering uncovered that during the 1995-2014 period 17 thematic clusters are formed. Drawing the strategic diagram showed that clusters “input devices”, “business analysis”, and “responsive modules” are among mature clusters in Knowledge Discovery.
Conclusion: The combination of concepts in this study showed that the domain of knowledge discovery is heavily dependent on computer tools, information technologies, communication technologies, and human being as the last loop in the period of systematic data analysis.

Keywords


بهشتیان، مهدی و ابوالحسنی، حسین. (1384). سیستم‌های اطلاعات مدیریت نگرشی جامع بر تئوری، کاربردی و طراحی. تهران: انتشارات شرکت پردیس.
سهیلی، فرامرز، خاصه، علی‌اکبر و قاضی‌زاده، حمید. (زودآیند). ترسیم ساختار دانش در پژوهش‌های علوم قرآن و حدیث ایران با استفاده از تحلیل هم‌واژگانی. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی.
سهیلی، فرامرز، خاصه، علی‌اکبر و کرانیان، پریوش. (1397). روند موضوعی مفاهیم حوزه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی ایران بر اساس تحلیل هم‌رخدادی واژگان. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان‌دهی اطلاعات، 29 (2)، 171-190.
سهیلی، فرامرز، شعبانی، علی و خاصه، علی‌اکبر. (1395). ساختار فکری دانش در حوزه رفتار اطلاعاتی: مطالعه هم‌واژگانی. تعامل انسان و اطلاعات، 2 (4)،21-36.
غضنفری، مهدی، علیزاده، سمیه و تیمورپور، بابک. (1387). داده‌کاوی و کشف دانش. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.
منصوری، علی، توکلی‌زاده ‌راوری، محمد، مکی‌زاده، فاطمه و طوسی، زیبا. (1395). روند تکامل فناوری: مورد مطالعه تحلیل رده‌های موضوعی پروانه‌های ثبت اختراع RFID. پژوهش‌نامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 32 (1)، 75-91.
Aristodemou, L., Tietze, F., Athanassopoulou, N. & Minshall, T. (2017). Exploring the Future of Patent Analytics: A Technology Roadmapping Approach. Centre for Technology Management Working Paper Series, No 5. This Paper Has Been Accepted to the R&D Management Conference in Leuven, Belgium.
Callon M., Courtial J.P. & Turner W. (1991). La méthode Leximappe: un outil pour l’analyse stratégique du développement scientifique et technique. Gestion de la recherche: Nouveaux problèmes nouveaux outils, 207-277.‏
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P. & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word Analysis as a Tool for Describing the Network of Interactions Between Basic and Technological Research: the Case of Polymer Chemsitry. Scientometrics, 22 (1), 155-205.
Chen, X., Chen, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y. & Li, J. (2016). Mapping the Research Trends by Co-Word Analysis Based on Keywords from Funded Project. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 547 – 555.
Chen, Y.L. & Huang, T.C.K. (2008). A novel knowledge discovering model for mining fuzzy multi-level sequential patterns in sequence databases. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 66 (3), 349–367.
Chung. M.H., Wang, Y., Tang, H., Zou, W., Basinger, J., Xu, X. & Tong, W. (2015). Asymmetric author-topic model for knowledge discovering of big data in toxicogenomics. Frontiers in pharmacology, 6, 81
Delecroix, B. & Eppstein, R. (2004). Co-word Analysis for The Non-Scientific Information Example of Reuters Business Briefings. Data science journal, 3, 80-87.
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G.G. & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric Cartography of Information Retrieval Research by Using Co-word Analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37 (6), 817-842.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Colomo-Palacios, R. & Hsu, J. Y. (2013). Discovering Knowledge through Highly Interactive Information Based Systems. Journal of Information Science and Engineering (JISE), 29 (1), Foreword to the volume.
He, Q. (1999). Knowledge Discovery through Co-word Analysis. Library trends, 48 (1), 133-159.
Khasseh, A., Soheili, F., Sharif moghaddam, H. & Mousavi chelak, A. (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge of imetrics: A co- word analysis. Information processing & management, 53 (3), 705-720.
Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J. & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the Mapping of Scientific Change: A Co-word Analysis of Research into Environmental Acidification. Scientometrics, 14 (3), 251-264.
Li, R., Chambers, T., Ding, Y., Zhang, G. & Meng, L. (2014). Patent Citation Analysis: Calculating Science Linkage Based on Citing Motivation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65 (5), 1007–1017.
Liu, G.Y., Hu, J.M. & Wang, H.L. (2012). A Co-word Analysis of Digital Library Field in China. Scientometrics, 91 (1), 203-217.
Melcer, E., Nguyen, T.H.D., Chen, Z., Canossa, A., El-Nasr, M.S. & Isbister, K. (2015). Games Research Today: Analyzing the Academic Landscape 2000-2014. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on The Foundations of Digital Games, At Pacific Grove. CA, USA, 9p.
Rancan, C., Pesado, P. & Garcia-Martinez, R. (2010). Issues in Rule Based Knowledge Discovering Process. Advances and Applications in Statistical Sciences, Proceedings of the IV Meeting on Dynamics of Social and Economic Systems, 2 (2), 303-314.
Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A., & Singh, S.N. (2015). Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: A co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005-2010). Scientometrics, 102 (2), 929-955.
Wang, X.D., Liu, J.J. & Sheng, F.S. (2014). Analysis of hotspots in the field of domestic knowledge discovery based on co-word analysis method. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 14 (5), 145-158.
Wanying, Z., Jin, M. & Kun, L. (2018). Ranking Themes on Co-word Networks: Exploring the Relationships. Information Processing and Management, 54 (2), 203-218.
Zong, Q.J., Shen, H.Z., Yuan, Q.J., Hu, X.W., Hou, Z.P. & Deng, S.G. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94 (2), 781-799.