بررسی بازتاب مأموریت‌های دانشگاهی نوین در برنامه‌های راهبردی دانشگاه‌های جهان به کمک ترسیم نقشه هم‌واژگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت اطلاعات و دانش؛ دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی؛ دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

2 دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی؛ استاد؛ دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی؛ دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

3 دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، استادیار، گروه پژوهشی سنجش علم و فناوری؛ موسسه استنادی و پایش علم و فناوری جهان اسلام (ISC)، شیراز، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: آموزش عالی، با مطالبات روزافزون برای پاسخگویی به چالش­های صنعت و جامعه روبرو­ست. ازآنجاکه شواهد پژوهشی اندکی در­باره پاسخ دانشگاه‌های جهان در دسترس است، پژوهش حاضر کوشیده با تحلیل محتوای برنامه‌های راهبردی دانشگاه‌­ها، به شناخت رویکرد آن‌ها به مأموریت‌های جدید و نقش سطح پیشرفت کشور در این رویکرد دست یابد.
روش‌شناسی: نمونه پژوهش، 956 برنامه راهبردی دانشگاه­های جهان قابل‌دسترس در گوگل بود که محتوای آن‌ها با تحلیل هم­‌واژگان، در نرم‌افزار ووس‌ویور ترسیم شد. واژه‌­نامه‌­ای برای کنترل واژه‌ها طراحی و استفاده شد. وزن دهی بر اساس سال آغاز برنامه و سطح پیشرفت کشور (شامل شاخص‌­های توسعه انسانی و درصد هزینه کرد بر تحقیق و توسعه) انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: پنج خوشه جامعه، دانشجو، سیستم‌، دگرگونی و تحصیلات تکمیلی شناسایی شد. گذشته از مأموریت‌های کلاسیک دانشگاهی، موضوعاتی مانند اجتماع، جهان، اقتصاد، توسعه پایدار، رشد اقتصادی، رشد اجتماعی، تعالی، تنوع، اقلیم و تغییرات اقلیمی نیز مشاهده شد. رخداد موضوعات ازجمله موضوعات مرتبط با مأموریت‌های نوین دانشگاه به تاریخ آغاز برنامه و سطح پیشرفت کشور بستگی دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: دانشگاه­­های جهان، افزون بر مأموریت‌های کلاسیک، به مأموریت‌های نوین مرتبط با اقتصاد، اجتماع و محیط‌زیست توجه دارند. وابستگی موضوعات به پیشرفت کشور، ضرورت واقع­‌بینی در تعیین اهداف کوتاه و بلندمدت دسترس‌­پذیر و نیز احتمال تشدید شکاف‌ میان کشورها بر اثر هدف‌گذاری‌های متفاوت آموزش عالی را گوشزد می­‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Reflection of New Academic Missions in the Strategic Plans of Universities Around the World: A Co-Word Mapping

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sanaz Poroushasb 1
  • Hajar Sotudeh 2
  • Maryam Yaghtin 3
1 Ph.D Candidate in Information and Knowledge Management; Department of Knowledge and Information Science; Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2 Ph.D in Knowledge and Information Science; Professor; Department of Knowledge and Information Science; Shiraz University; Shiraz, Iran.
3 Ph.D in Knowledge and Information Science; Assistant Professor; Department of Scientometrics; Islamic World Science and Technology Monitoring and Citation Institute (ISC), Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: In recent decades, higher education has increasingly faced pressures to address real-world challenges in social, economic, environmental, and technological domains. The literature indicates that universities have expanded the traditional notion of science to include new missions. Their responses to these demands varied based on their regulations and social contexts. Some universities demonstrated strong local or regional orientations, while others broadened their activities to become international players. Additionally, some institutions adapted their internal procedures to embrace new administrative methods or transformed into entrepreneurial universities. Consequently, the literature provides evidence of a positive response from universities, although this response is scattered and not uniform on a global scale.
As strategic plans offer managerial insights and operational frameworks for achieving organizational goals and missions, their content can be analyzed to examine university responses to various demands. This study employed a quantitative content analysis method to investigate the strategic plans of universities worldwide, exploring their approaches to new academic missions, the emerging subjects recently included in these plans and their correlation with the development levels of their respective countries.
Methodology: The research sample comprised the strategic plans of universities worldwide that are accessible on the web. The universities were initially identified using the list provided by the Scimago Institutions and University Rankings, which included 4,126 universities at the time of data collection in May 2022. By employing the following formula in the title field of documents indexed in Google, the strategic plan of each university was located, and its full text was downloaded:
("strategic plan" OR "strategic plans" OR "strategic planning" OR "Strategic * plan" OR "action plan" OR "action plans" OR "action planning" OR strategy OR vision OR mission OR values) AND [University Name]
852 strategic plans in both English and non-English languages were retrieved, available in either text or image formats. The non-English strategic plans were translated using Google Translate, while image files were converted into text with Google Docs. The complete texts of the strategic plans were then input as plain text into VoSViewer software, version 1.6.19, where their co-word maps were analyzed following linguistic pre-processing. A thesaurus was developed and utilized to standardize the terminology.
To identify novel subjects that have recently emerged in the strategic plans, they were weighted according to the commencement year of their respective periods. Furthermore, to examine the relationship between these subjects and the development levels of their respective countries, the plans were weighted by the Human Development Index and Gross Domestic Expenditure on Research and Development, as reported by the United Nations Development Program and the World Bank, respectively. A whole counting method was employed to calculate term frequencies. Additionally, a threshold of occurrence in at least ten strategic plans was established for a term to be included in the map. A total of 1,158 words or phrases were identified. By applying a threshold of 60% of the most relevant terms, 695 terms were included in the final map.
Findings: Five clusters were identified including “society”, “students”, “systems”, “transformation”, and “graduate programs”. The largest cluster, i.e., “society”, included the concepts related to education, research, and innovation. The terms “society” and “world” were respectively the biggest nodes in this cluster, indicating the connection of these main missions with real-world challenges. In the “graduate cluster”, the “global rankings” node occurred linked to “sustainable development goals”, “international collaborations”, and “partnerships”. In the “student” cluster, “courses" was the second largest node. Along with the terms related to classic academic missions (i.e., “students”, “graduate programs”, and “courses”), the terms related to new academic missions were observed including “communities”, “world”, “economy”, “sustainable development”, “economic growth”, “social growth”, “excellence”, “solutions”, “diversity”, “climate”, and “climate change”. The terms’ occurrences showed dependence on the plans’ novelty and country development level. For example, the terms “communities”, “social enterprises”, “sustainability”, “global rankings”, “sustainable development goals”, “web applications”, and “circular economy” occurred for moderately to highly developed countries.
Conclusion: Universities worldwide have broadened their focus beyond traditional missions to encompass new objectives related to the economy, society, and the environment. The reliance on these terms varies according to each country's level of development, highlighting the necessity for pragmatic policymaking to establish achievable short- and long-term goals. Furthermore, this situation raises concerns about the potential to deepen divides among nations due to differing objectives set for higher education. Notably, the lack of terms associated with research output and traditional mission-oriented ranking systems poses a challenge to the for ranking's sake approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Strategic plans
  • Generations of universities
  • University missions
  • Higher education
  • Sustainable development
تسلیمی، م.، فاتح راد، م.، و چهل تنی، س. م. (1399). عوامل تحقق هدف دریایی توسعه پایدار از منظر دانشگاه‌های نسل سوم. فصلنامه علمی آموزش علوم دریایی، 7(1)، 48-68.‎
    https://rmt.iranjournals.ir/article_38362.html
خلیلی شورینی، س.، و محضری، م. (1393). شناخت موانع اجرای برنامه‌‌های استراتژیک و اولویت­بندی آن­ها. پژوهش‌های مدیریت راهبردی، 20(56)، 111-132.  https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/smr/Article/1095408
Addie, J. P. D. (2019). Urban (izing) university strategic planning: An analysis of London and New York City. Urban Affairs Review, 55(6), 1612-1645.
Akyıldız, F. (2021). CSR and Turkish Universities in ARWU 2018: An evaluation of the strategic plans and performance reports. In Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives: Proceedings of the 33rd Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 321-341). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85304-4_20
Al-Azri, M., Al-Jubari, I., & Albattat, A. (2021). The impact of strategic planning factors on service quality: an empirical study of private universities in Oman. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(7), 557-569.
      https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO7.0557
Al-Harethi, A. A. M., & Al-Maamari, Q. A. (2018). The Impact of Strategic Planning on Improving Institutional Performance at Limkokwing University of Creative Technology in Malaysia. International Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science, 4(3), 112-129.
Aljuwaiber, A. (2019). Knowledge strategy and leadership and their roles in change at universities. Journal of Strategy and Management, 11(1), 17.
      https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v11n1p17
Almansoori, M. R. M. A., Al-Tahitah, A. N. A., & Battour, M. M. K. M. (2021). The Impact of Strategic Planning on The Performance of Economic Governmental Organizations: The Moderating Role of Organizational Leadership and Sustainability. International Journal of Contemporary Management and Information Technology, 1(6), 1-8.
Al-Qudah, S., Obeidat, A., Shrouf, H., & A. Abusweilem, M. (2020). The impact of strategic human resources planning on the organizational performance of public shareholding companies in Jordan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(1), 219-230.
      https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.19
Bautista Chamizo, E., Martinez-Martinez, D., Andrades Peña, J., Herrera Madueño, J., & Larrán Jorge, M. (2023). Spanish universities and SDGs achievement: analysis of strategic plans and other sustainability-related practices. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 53(1) 50-74.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2023.2284469
Berisha, E., Caprioli, C., & Cotella, G. (2022). Unpacking SDG target 11. a: What is it about and how to measure its progress? City and Environment Interactions, 14, p. 100080.
      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100080
Beyhan, B., & Findik, D. (2018). Student and graduate entrepreneurship: ambidextrous universities create more nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1346-1374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9590-z
Beynaghi, A., Trencher, G., Moztarzadeh, F., Mozafari, M., Maknoon, R., & Leal Filho, W. (2016). Future sustainability scenarios for universities: Moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3464-3478. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.117
Bieler, A., & McKenzie, M. (2017). Strategic planning for sustainability in Canadian higher education. Sustainability, 9(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020161
Blasco, N., Brusca, I., & Labrador, M. (2020). Drivers for universities’ contribution to the sustainable development goals: An analysis of Spanish public universities. Sustainability, 13(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010089
Boffo, S., & Cocorullo, A. (2019). University Fourth Mission: Spin-offs and Academic Entrepreneurship: Connecting Public Policies with new missions and management issues of universities. In Higher Education Forum (Vol. 16, pp. 125-142). Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1308034.pdf
Bryson, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dankevych, V. Y., Kamenchuk, T. O., Kononova, O. Y., Nadtochii, I. I., & Ohor, H. M. (2020). Strategic planning for sustainable development of states: Administration aspect. International Journal of Management, 11(4), 511-522.  
Dimitriou, H. T., & Thompson, R. (2007). Strategic planning for regional development in the UK. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203641620
Djoundourian, S., & Shahin, W. (2022). Academia–business cooperation: A strategic plan for an innovative executive education program. Industry and Higher Education, 36(6), 835-845. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221083852
Elwood, L.P., & Leyden, V. M. (2000). Strategic planning and cultural considerations in tertiary education systems: the Irish case. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696674
Fantauzzi, C., Colasanti, N., Fiorani, G., & Frondizi, R. (2021). Sustainable strategic planning in Italian higher education institutions: a content analysis. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(5), 1145-1165.
      https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2020-0275
Franzoni, Ch., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Academic entrepreneurs: Critical issues and lessons for Europe. In Varga, A. (Ed.) Universities, Knowledge Transfer and Regional Development (p. 163-190). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
      https://dhriiti.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Academic-Entrepreneurs.pdf
Gaffikin, F., & Perry, D. C. (2009). Discourses and strategic visions: The US research university as an institutional manifestation of neoliberalism in a global era. American Educational Research Journal46(1), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208322180
García Aracil, A. (2013). What is it that differentiates the universities in Spain? A quality perspective.13(3), 61-76.
https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/105642/1/differentiates%20the%20universities%20in%20Spain.pdf;WHAT (Accessed 20 June 2023)
George, B., Walker, R. M., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13104
Gomez, A. C., & Gomez, A. C. (2021). Content analysis of mission statements of selected state universities in the Philippines: basis for strategic educational management planning. Globus Journal of Progressive Education, 11(1), 7-12.
Gossling-Goidsmiths, J. (2018). Sustainable development goals and uncertainty visualization [Unpublished master’s dissetation]. University of Twente.
      https://cartographymaster.eu/wp-content/theses/2018_GOSLING-GOLDSMITH_Thesis.pdf
Guerra, F. R., Zamora, R., Hernandez, R., & Menchaca, V. D. (2017). University strategic planning: A process for change in a principal preparation program. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 12(1), 1-14.
Hamzah, R. Y., Alnaser, N. W., & Alnaser, W. E. (2018). Accelerating the transformation to a green university: University of Bahrain experience [Conference presentation]. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 48, p. 06002). EDP Sciences.
      https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184806002
Immordino, K. M., Gigliotti, R. A., Ruben, B. D., & Tromp, S. (2016). Evaluating the Impact of Strategic Planning in Higher Education. Educational Planning, 23(1), 35-47.
Jameie, S. B. (2018). Towards Third Generation Universities in Iran: Wish or Necessity. Thrita, 7(2), e85332. https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita.85332
Kabir, A. H. (2021). ‘Network governance’ and the formation of the strategic plan in the higher education sector in Bangladesh. Journal of Education Policy, 36(4), 455-479.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1717637
Khalili Shurini, S., & Mehdhari, M. (2015). Knowing the obstacles to implementing strategic plans and prioritizing them. Strategic Management Researches, 20(56), 111-132.
Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (2000). Transforming Higher Education: A comparative study. London: Jessica Kingsley.
      https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4020-4657-5
Kolade, A. B., Olanipon, O. O., & Olumuyiwa, O. M. (2018). The Impact of Strategic Planning on Performance in the University Education: A Case Study of University of Ibadan, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(5), 206-219.
Larsen, I. M., & Langfeldt, L. (2005). Profiling comprehensiveness? Strategy formulation and effects of strategic programmes at traditional universities. In Reform and change in higher education (pp. 343-361). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3411-3_20
Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017 October 14). New functions of universities in century XXI towards “fourth generation” universities. San Francisco, California.
      https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022727 (Accessed 20 August 2023).
Lumpkin, G. T., & Bacq, S. (2019). Civic wealth creation: A new view of stakeholder engagement and societal impact. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 383-404.
      https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0060
Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
Morphew, C. C., & Hartley, M. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456-471.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778934 
Ndou, V., & Schiuma, G. (2020). The role of social innovation for a knowledge-based local development: insights from the literature review. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 11(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2020.106841
Neary, J., & Osborne, M. (2018). University engagement in achieving sustainable development goals: A synthesis of case studies from the SUEUAA study. Australian Journal of Adult Learning58(3), 336-364. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1199947.pdf
Nickols, F. (2016). Strategy, strategic management, strategic planning and strategic thinking. Management Journal, 1(1), 4-7.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=e89938e5124cd1982752dd2716d73467aab13ec6
Ofori, D., & Atiogbe, E. (2012). Strategic planning in public universities: A developing country perspective. Journal of Management and Strategy, 3(1), 67-82.
      https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v3n1p67
Olo, D., Correia, L., & Rego, C. (2021). Higher education institutions and development: Missions, models, and challenges. Journal of Social Studies Education Research12(2), 1-25.  https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219851
Onyido, I. (2021). The Role of Nigerian Universities in Nigeria’s Quest to attain the Sustainable Development Goals. In F. A. Anyogu, C. A. Eme, & J. A. Ogbodo. (Eds.), University-Led Knowledge and Innovation for Sustainable Development, pp. 7-23. Nigeria: Boldscholar Research Ltd. http://repository.unizik.edu.ng/bitstream/123456789/639/1/University-Led-Knowledge-and-Innovation-for-Sustainable-Development1.pdf#page=25
Paletta, A., & Bonoli, A. (2019). Governing the university in the perspective of the United Nations 2030 Agenda: The case of the University of Bologna. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(3), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0083
Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), s246-s254.
      https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x
Rabbinge, R., & Slingerland, M. A. (2009). Change in knowledge in infrastructure: The third generation university. In K. J. Poppe, C. Termeer, & M. Slingerland (Eds.), Transitions towards sustainable agriculture and food chains in peri-urban areas (pp. 51-61). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Ramos-Monge, E. L., Llinàs-Audet, X., & Barrena-Martínez, J. (2019). Catalysts of university social responsibility into strategic planning by thematic analysis and deductive coding. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 23(4), 327-355.
Raszkowski, A., & Bartniczak, B. (2019). On the road to sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 agenda sustainable development goals (SDG) in Poland. Sustainability, 11(2), 1-20.
Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2015). Metric-wiseness. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2389-2389. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23558
Rousseau, S., & Rousseau, R. (2017). Being metric-wise: Heterogeneity in bibliometric knowledge. El profesional de la información (EPI), 26(3), 480-487.
      https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.may.14
Saffari, H., Farhadian, H., Sadighi, H., Choobchian, S., & Abbasi, E. (2022). Strategic analysis of entrepreneur university of Applied Sciences and technology in agricultural sector. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 24(3), 521-535.
Sanyal, B. C., & Varghese, N. V. (2006 November). Research capacity of the higher education sector in developing countries [Paper presentation]. In the 2nd International Colloquium on Research and Higher Education Policy. Paris, France.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=e7307aba4fcd1e32bf057e4bb81b9e83bdf2cad2
Shah, M. (2013). Renewing strategic planning in universities at a time of uncertainty. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 17(1), 24-29.
      https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2012.679753
Shattock, M. (2008). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European Higher Education: Diversification and organizational change in European Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. https://medical.library.lincoln.ac.uk/items/114173
Sierra, E. R. C. (2013). The concept of strategy as a basis for strategic planning. Pensamiento & Gestión, 35,152-181.
Taslimi, M. S., Fateh Rad, M., & Cheheltani, S. M. (2020). Factors to Realize the Marine Purpose of Sustainable Development from the perspective of Third Generation Universities. Journal of Research on Management of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 7(1), 48-68.
      https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25383655.1399.7.1.4.1 [In Persian].
Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N., & Kraines, S. B. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044
UN (2016). "The 17 Goals". Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved 27 Jan 2024 from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/
Waas, T., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2010). University research for sustainable development: Definition and characteristics explored. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 629-636. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.017
Wyatt, A. T. M. (2011). Concepts, ideas, visions: thematic characteristics of strategic plans among elite, international universities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia.  https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/wyatt_adam_t_201112_phd.pdf