نقش زنان در بازسازی مسکن پس از سانحه: یک مرور نظام‌مند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشگر دورۀ دکتری معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه معماری منظر و سوانح، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف این مطالعه، بررسی نظام‌مند تولیدات علمی در حوزة بازسازی مسکن پس از سوانح با تأکید بر نقش و جایگاه زنان است، باهدف تحلیل وضعیت موجود، شناسایی روندهای پژوهشی و آشکارسازی شکاف‌های دانش در این حوزه.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از روش مرور نظام‌مند و تحلیل محتوای کمی و کیفی، 32 مقالة منتخب از پایگاه‌های داده‌ای اسکوپوس و وب‌آوساینس را موردبررسی قرار داده است. تحلیل داده‌ها شامل بررسی فراوانی واژگان، تحلیل هم‌رخدادی واژگان با استفاده از نرم‌افزار ووس ویور، تحلیل روند زمانی انتشار مقالات، شناسایی مجلات و کشورهای پیشرو و تحلیل شبکه‌های هم‌تألیفی بوده است. همچنین، برای اعتبارسنجی یافته‌ها و تکمیل تحلیل محتوا، از نظرات خبرگان بهره گرفته‌شده است.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که اغلب پژوهش‌های پیشین بر «آسیب‌پذیری» زنان در برابر سوانح تمرکز داشته‌اند‌ و کمتر به «توانمندسازی» و «مشارکت فعال» آن‌ها در فرآیند بازسازی پرداخته‌اند. تحلیل روند زمانی نیز حاکی از افزایش علاقه‌مندی به این موضوع در سال‌های اخیر (به‌ویژه پس از 2019) است؛ بااین‌حال، این روند یکنواخت نبوده و متأثر از عواملی نظیر وقوع سوانح بزرگ و تغییر در سیاست‌های بین‌المللی بوده است. مجله «سوانح» بیشترین تعداد مقالات را در این زمینه منتشر کرده و کشورهای درحال‌توسعه، به‌ویژه بنگلادش و برخی دانشگاه‌های خاص و فعال در این کشورها، سهم عمده‌ای در تولیدات علمی داشته‌اند.
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌های این پژوهش بر ضرورت توجه هرچه بیشتر به نقش فعال و توانمندی‌های زنان در بازسازی مسکن پس از سوانح تأکید دارد و درعین‌حال، شکاف‌های پژوهشی قابل‌توجهی را در این زمینه آشکار می‌سازد. پر کردن این شکاف‌ها مستلزم انجام مطالعات بیشتر، به‌ویژه پژوهش‎های طولی، مطالعات تطبیقی بین فرهنگی و پژوهش‌های کیفی عمیق با رویکرد مشارکتی است. همچنین، توسعه سیاست‌ها و برنامه‌های بازسازی با حساسیت جنسیتی از دیگر الزامات مهم در این حوزه به شمار می‌رود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Women's Role in Post-Disaster Housing Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

نویسندگان [English]

  • Atoosa Hassani 1
  • Zoheir Mottaki 2
  • Morteza Adib 2
1 PhD Candidate in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Landscape Architecture and Reconstruction, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: This study presents a systematic review of the scientific literature on post-disaster housing reconstruction, with a particular focus on the multifaceted roles of women. It aims to synthesize existing knowledge, analyze research trends, identify critical gaps, and highlight areas requiring further investigation. Moving beyond the conventional portrayal of women as passive victims of disasters, this study explores their active participation, agency, and leadership in rebuilding efforts while acknowledging the persistent vulnerabilities they encounter.
Methodology: Employing a systematic review approach, this study analyzes 32 selected articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The review methodology follows established frameworks, drawing insights from Kitchenham and Charters (2007) and Bani Asadi et al. (2023). The research process involved: (1) defining rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, specifically focusing on women's roles in post-disaster housing reconstruction rather than broader disaster recovery efforts; (2) implementing a comprehensive search strategy using key terms; (3) systematically reviewing and coding selected articles based on methodologies, findings, and key concepts; (4) conducting content analysis, including word frequency analysis, co-occurrence analysis via VOSviewer, and a temporal analysis of publication trends; and (5) validating findings through expert consultation.
Findings: The analysis yielded several key insights:
The literature predominantly emphasizes vulnerability. Although terms like "women" and "disaster" were frequent due to the search parameters, the prevailing discourse primarily frames women as victims rather than active agents in reconstruction. This indicates a persistent gap in recognizing their leadership and agency in rebuilding efforts.
While vulnerability remains a focal point, the analysis identified an increasing, though still limited, acknowledgment of women's resilience, participation, and leadership in reconstruction processes. Co-occurrence analysis revealed nine thematic clusters: gendered vulnerabilities, social resilience, physical reconstruction of housing, policy and adaptive capacities, and community participation. These clusters indicate a slow but growing recognition of women's roles, moving beyond the perception of them as passive recipients of aid.
The number of publications addressing women in post-disaster housing reconstruction has risen over time, particularly after 2019. This trend may reflect a broader global awareness of gender equality and its relevance to disaster recovery policies. However, given the study's limited sample size, caution is necessary when interpreting these patterns. Nevertheless, the increasing research interest signals the importance of integrating gender-sensitive approaches into reconstruction policies and academic discourse.
Research on this topic is geographically concentrated in the Americas, particularly in the U.S. and Canada, and in Asia, with a significant focus on Bangladesh. The prominence of Bangladesh likely stems from its high exposure to natural disasters and its evolving policy focus on disaster resilience. However, other regions remain underrepresented in the literature, highlighting the need for more geographically diverse research.
The journal Disasters emerged as the most prominent publication venue in this field, reflecting its specialized focus on disaster research. Other significant outlets include the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Gender, Place & Culture. This distribution of publications underscores the interdisciplinary nature of the research, showing increasing intersections between post-disaster reconstruction, gender issues, and the fields of public health, geography, and social sciences.
Expert consultation corroborated these findings, emphasizing the dominant focus on vulnerability and the relative scarcity of studies addressing women's active participation and leadership. Experts also highlighted the need for more qualitative research to capture women's lived experiences and contributions in diverse socio-cultural contexts.
Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the crucial yet often underexplored role of women in post-disaster housing reconstruction. While a growing body of literature acknowledges their contributions, the predominant narrative still focuses on their vulnerabilities rather than their agency and leadership. The findings reveal significant research gaps, particularly regarding women’s involvement in decision-making, the long-term impacts of reconstruction policies on gender equality, and the intersection of cultural and socio-economic factors in shaping women’s experiences.
Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies to assess the long-term effectiveness of policies and interventions, cross-cultural analyses to compare different regional approaches, participatory qualitative research to capture women’s voices, and critical policy evaluations to identify best practices. Additionally, developing context-specific indicators to measure women's empowerment in reconstruction efforts will provide more tangible insights into progress and remaining challenges.By addressing these gaps, scholars and policymakers can contribute to more inclusive, equitable, and effective post-disaster housing reconstruction strategies. Recognizing and empowering women as key agents of change will not only improve disaster recovery outcomes but also foster greater resilience and social equity in affected communities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Housing reconstruction
  • Disaster
  • Women
  • Gender
  • Systematic review
  • Em-powerment
  • Vulneraility
ابراهیم‌زاده، ف.، مهدیزاده سراج، ف.، نوروزیان ملکی، س.، و پیری، س. (1402). ارزیابی تولیدات علمی در حوزه فعالیت جسمانی دانش‌آموزان با تمرکز بر ویژگی‌های کالبدی فضای باز در مدارس ابتدایی: یک مرور نظام‌مند. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی، 9(2)، 385–412.  https://rsci.shahed.ac.ir/article_3706.html.
رئیس زاده، م.، و کرمعلی، م. (1401). ترسیم نقشه علمی مقالات حوزه ترومای نظامی با استفاده از تحلیل هم واژگانی در مدلاین. طب نظامی، 20(5)، 476-487.  https://militarymedj.bmsu.ac.ir/article_1000773.html
محمودی، م.، و سودایی، ب.. (1402). مطالعه تطبیقی نقشمایه زن در آثار هنری بین النهرین و سرسنجاق‌های لرستان بر اساس کهن‌الگوی یونگ.  نگره، 18(67)، 229-243.
Ahmadi Marzaleh, M., Peyravi, M., Moradi, H. A., & Raeyat Mohtashami, A. (2023). Women’s reproductive health in disasters a systematic review. Health Management & Information Science, 10(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.30476/jhmi.2023.100416.1188
Akerkar, S. (2007). Disaster mitigation and furthering women’s rights: learning from the tsunami. Gender, Technology and Development, 11(3), 357-388.
Alfonzo, P., Sakraida, T. J., & Hastings-Tolsma, M. (2014). Bibliometrics: Visualizing the impact of nursing research. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 18(1), 1-16.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284458471
Ali, Z. S. (2014). Visual representation of gender in flood coverage of Pakistani print media. Weather and Climate Extremes, 4, (August), 35-49.
Alsamara, K., Kakaje, A., Soqia, J., Ghareeb, A., Watson, L., Hadakie, R., Jawich, K., Al-Homsi, A. & Forbes, D. (2024). Exploring women’s religious coping strategies and psychological impact after the 2023 earthquake in Syria.  Journal of Religion and Health, 63(3), 2314-2326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02005-8
Anderson, M. B. (1994). Understanding the disaster-development continuum: gender analysis is the essential tool. Gender & Development, 2(1), 7-10.
Andrabi, S. (2021). Decolonising knowledge production in disaster management: a feminist perspective. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 31(3), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2021-0154
Ayeb-Karlsson, S. (2020). I do not like her going to the shelter: Stories on gendered disaster (im) mobility and wellbeing loss in Coastal Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50(101904). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101904
Azad, A. K., Hossain, K. M., & Nasreen, M. (2013). Flood-induced vulnerabilities and problems encountered by women in northern Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4(4), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-013-0020-z
Baniasadi, A., Salehi, K., Khodaie, E., Bagheri Noaparast, K. & Izanloo, B. (2023). Fairness in classroom assessment: A systematic review. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00636-z
Baytiyeh, H. (2017). Why school resilience should be critical for the post-earthquake recovery of communities in divided societies. Education and Urban Society, 51(5), 693-711.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards and People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge.
Bradshaw, S., & Fordham, M. (2013). Women, Girls and Disasters: A Review for DFID. Middlesex University.
Brolles, L., Derivois, D., Eva Joseph, N. E., Karray, A., Guillier Pasut, N., Mary Cénat, J., Pamphile, J., Marlise Lafontant, E., Richard Alexandre, M., Felix, G., & Chouvier, B. (2017). Art Workshop with Haitian Street Children in a Post-Earthquake Context: Resilience, Relationship and Socialisation. International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape, 22(1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2016.1245768
Cannon, T. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of natural disasters. In A. Varley (Ed.), Disasters, Development and Environment (pp. 14-30). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/121102
Çelik, M., Ercan, G., Ayaz, A., Yakut İpekoğlu, H., Baltaci, F., Kurtoğlu, M., Sevgican, Ş., Yardımcı, H. Ç., Küçükyılmaz, S., Özmen, C. G., Çayır, B., Düzcan, M. E., & Sevin, D. (2024). Gender differences in human behaviors during an earthquake. gender differences in human behaviors during an earthquake. In M. A. Erberik, A. Askan, & M.K. Kockar, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (ICEES 2023) (pp. 557–568). Springer.
Cox, H. (1998). Women in Bushfire Territory. In E. Enarson, & B. H. Morrow (Eds,), The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes (pp. 133-142). Praeger. https://www.academia.edu/943557/The_Gendered_Terrain_of_Disaster_Through_Womens_Eyes_E_Enarson_and_B_H_Morrow_eds_1998
Cox, R. S., Long, B. C., Jones, M. I., & Handler, R. J. (2008). Sequestering of suffering: Critical discourse analysis of  natural disaster media coverage. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(4), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308088518
Cvetković, V. M., Roder, G., Öcal, A., Tarolli, P., & Dragićević, S. (2018). The role of gender in preparedness and response behaviors towards flood risk in Serbia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2761.
Dufka, C. L. (1988). The Mexico City earthquake disaster. Social Casework, 69(3), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438948806900305
Ebrahimzadeh, F., Mehdizadeh Saradj, F., Norouzian-Maleki, S., & Piri, S. (2024). Analysis of scientific products in the field of physical activity of students focusing on the physical characteristics of outdoor space in primary schools: A systematic review. Scientometrics Research Journal, 9(2), 385-412. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2022.15591.1551
[In Persian].
Enarson, E., & Pease, B. (2018). The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women's eyes. In B. Pease, & E. Enarson (Eds.), Men, Masculinities and Disaster (pp. 2-20). Routledge.
https://www.routledge.com/Men-Masculinities-and-Disaster/Enarson-Pease/p/book/9781138324602?srsltid=AfmBOopGp4HMmobpApxPSGPVjpKjy0clLxQ4cjdqnxzaqlPLtv4hEN5-
Esfandiari, H., & Heideman, K. (2015). The role and status of women after the Arab uprisings. Strategic Sectors: Culture & Society, 303-306. https://www.iemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Role-and-Status-of-Women-after-the-Arab-Uprisings.pdf
Fajarwati, A., Wardhani, A. G., & Sintesa, M. P. (2020). Journey of researches on gender and disaster in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 451(1), 021048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/451/1/012048
Fatema, S. R, Islam, M. S., East, L., & Usher, K. (2019). Women’s health-related vulnerabilities in natural disasters: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open, 9(12), e032079.
Fatema, S. R., East, L., Islam, M. S., & Usher, K. (2021). Health impact and risk factors affecting South and Southeast Asian women following natural disasters: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(21), 11068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111068
Fernández Saavedra, A. G., González Arias, R., Dema Moreno, S., & Cocina Díaz, V. (2023). Gender and leadership in the wake of the 2010 earthquake and tsunami in Chile. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 32(2), 323-336.
First, J. M. (2024). Examining Tornado exposure, post-tornado distress, and gender following the March 2020 Tornado in Nashville, Tennessee. Environmental Hazards, 24(3), 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2024.2379895
Fisher, S. (2010). Violence against women and natural disasters: findings from post-tsunami Sri Lanka. Violence Against Women, 16(8), 902-918.
Gaillard, J. C., Fordham, M., & Sanz, K. (2015). Culture, gender and disaster: from vulnerability to capacities. In F. Kruger, G. Bankoff, B. Orlowski, L.F. Schipper (Eds.), Cultures and Disasters: Understanding Cultural Framings in Disaster Risk Reduction (pp. 222-234). Routledge. https://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/216349
Gaillard, J. C., Gorman-Murray, A., & Fordham, M. (2017). Sexual and gender minorities in disaster. gender, place and culture, 24(1), 18-26.
Gotham, K. F., & Cheek, W. (2017). Post-disaster recovery and rebuilding. In S. Hall. & R. Burdett (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of the 21st Century City (pp. 279-297). Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319084991_Post-disaster_Recovery_and_Rebuilding
Hall, S., Sloan-Aagard, C., Harris, R., Emmett, C., Prasetyadi, C., Pettersson, J., Cope, A., & Hamson Cox, M. (2022). Perceptions of tsunami susceptibility and self-efficacy among adolescents in Indonesia: The influence of gender, religion, location, age, hazard information source, and past experience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 79(103151). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103151
Hickson, J., & Marshan, J. (2022). Labour market effects of bushfires and floods in Australia: A Gendered perspective. Economic Record, 981-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12688
Ikhsan, M., Siregar, M. F. G., & Muharam, R. (2017). The relationship between ramadan fasting with menstrual cycle pattern changes in teenagers. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 22(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2016.08.004
Kangoma, M., Lubanga, F. A. & Bwanali, A. N. (2023). Mental health impact of the 2023 Tropical Cyclone Freddy and Southern Region Mudslides on Malawian women: The neglected humanitarian crisis. International Journal of Surgery: Global Health, 6(5), e0306. https://doi.org/10.1097/GH9.0000000000000306
Kawachi, I., Aida, J., Hikichi, H. & Kondo, K. (2020). Disaster resilience in aging populations: lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 50(2), 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2020.1722186
Kelman, I. (2019). Axioms and actions for preventing disasters. Progress in Disaster Science, 2, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100008
Khalaj, M., Kamali, M., Costa, M. E. V., & Capela, I. (2020). Green synthesis of nanomaterials- A scientometric assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 1-17.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01. Keele University, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Software Engineering Group; University of Durham, Department of Computer Science.
Kurniawan, A., Maarif, S., & Rahardi, C. S. (2021). The role of women in community development after earthquake, tsunami, and liquefaction in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ganaya. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(2), 722-742.
Llorente-Marrón, M., Díaz-Fernández, M., Dema Moreno, S., & Méndez-Rodríguez, P. (2020-a). Socioeconomic consequences of natural disasters on gender relations: the case of Haiti. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50(101693).
Llorente-Marrón, M., Díaz-Fernández, M., Méndez-Rodríguez, P., & González Arias, R. (2020-b). Social vulnerability, gender and disasters. the case of Haiti in 2010. Sustainability, 12(9), 3574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093574
Mahmoodi, M., & Sodaei, B. (2023). A Comparative study of the picture of women and accompanying motifs in mesopotamian artifacts and Lorestan pinheads based on yung’s archetype. Negareh Journal, 18(67), 229-243.
https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2022.14814.2826 [In Persian].
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, 81-95.
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). Accounting research: a bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109
Meyer, K. (2020). Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Toolkit for Humanitarian Settings. The Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG).  
Möller, A. M., Ansari, P., Ebrahim, N. A., & Khoo, S. (2016). Physical activity and aging research: A Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 24(3), 476-483. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0188
Nahar, K., & Binti Tajuddin, N. A. (2022). A Systematic review on women’s disaster adaptation strategies in changing climate. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(6), 257-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.36348/sjhss.2022.v07i06.003
Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: the impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981-2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551–666.
Nguyen, H. T. (2018). Gendered vulnerabilities in times of natural disasters: male-to-female violence in the Philippines in the Aftermath of Super Typhoon Haiyan. Violence Against Women, 25(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218790701
Oliver-Smith, A. (1996). Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.303
Oxfam. (2005). Oxfam Briefing Note: The Tsunami’s Impact on Women. Oxfam International. https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/the-tsunamis-impact-on-women-115038/
Paton, D., & Johnston, D. M.  (2017). Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach (2nd ed.). Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Paul, S. K., Paul, B. K., & Routray, J. K. (2012). Post-Cyclone Sidr nutritional status of women and children in coastal Bangladesh: An empirical study. Natural Hazards, 64, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0223-4
Pérez-Gañán, R., Dema Moreno, S., González Arias, R., & Cocina Díaz, V. (2022). How Do Women Face the Emergency Following a Disaster? A PRISMA 2020 Systematic Review. Natural Hazards, 116, 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05663-7
Phibbs, S., Good, G., Severinsen, C., Woodbury, E., & Williamson, K. (2014). What about Us? Reported experiences of disabled people related to the Christchurch earthquakes. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00930-7
Pinho-Gomes, A., Mcintosh, A., & Woodward, M. (2024). Sex differences in mortality associated with heatwaves: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Public Health, 34(3), ckae144.283. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.283
Quarantelli, E. L. (1999). What is a Disaster: Perspectives on the question. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 8(5), 370-452.
Quigley, K. F., & Quigley, J. (2013). Of gods and men: selected print media coverage of natural disasters and industrial failures in three westminster countries. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 10(1), 137-160.
Raeeszadeh, M., & Karamali, M. (2018). Scientific mapping of military trauma papers using co-word analysis in MEDLINE. Journal of Military Medicine, 20(5), 476-487.
https://militarymedj.bmsu.ac.ir/article_1000773.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Rivers, J. P. W. (1982). Women and children last: An essay on sex discrimination in disasters. Disasters, 6(4), 256–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1982.tb00548.x
Rushton, A., Phibbs, S., Kenney, C., & Anderson, C. (2021-a). I wouldn’t trade this country of ours for anything’: place, identity and men’s stories of the 2016 M7.8 Kaikōura/Waiau Earthquake. Social and Cultural Geography, 23(8),  1155-1173.
Rushton, A., Phibbs, S., Kenney, C., & Anderson, C. (2021-b). She’L Be Right’: The place of gendered emotions in disasters. Gender, Place and Culture, 29(6), 793-815.
Sa’diah, H., & Monggilo, Z. M. Z. (2022). Risk communication for earthquake mitigation in Indonesian women’s prison. Ultimacomm: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 14(1), 124-143.
Saito, F. (2012). Women and the 2011 East Japan disaster. Gender & Development, 20(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2012.687225
Salvati, P., Petrucci, O., Rossi, M., Biamchi, C., Pasqua, A. A., & Guzzetti, F. (2018). Gender, age and circumstances analysis of flood and landslide fatalities in Italy. Science of the Total Environment, 610-611, (January), 867-879.
Seager, J. (2014). Disasters are gendered: What’s new? In A. Singh, & Z. Zommers (Eds.), Reducing Disaster: Early Warning Systems for Climate Change (pp. 265–281). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8598-3_14
Shakya, K. (2016). Earthquake: Impact on Nepalese economy and women. Lowland Technology International, 18(2), 75-82. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/145190489.pdf
Tearne, J. E., Guragain, B., Ghimire, L., Leaning, J., & Newnham, E. A. (2021). The health and security of women and girls following disaster: a qualitative investigation in post-earthquake Nepal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 66(102622). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102622
Thurston, A. M., Stöckl, H., & Ranganathan, M. (2021). Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 6(4), e004377. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004377
Tyler, M., & Fairbrother, P. (2013). Bushfires are ‘Men’s Business’: The importance of gender and rural hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 110-119.
Valerio, K. A. (2014). Storm of violence, surge of struggle: Women in the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda). Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(1), 148-163.
Yumarni, T., & Amaratunga, D. (2018). Gender mainstreaming as a strategy to achieve sustainable post-disaster reconstruction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(5), 544-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0086
Zaidi, R. Z., & Fordham, M. (2021). The missing half of the Sendai framework: Gender and women in the implementation of global disaster risk reduction policy. Progress in Disaster Science,10(100170), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100170