پژوهش نامه علم سنجی

پژوهش نامه علم سنجی

تحلیل علم سنجی روند‌های پژوهشی در معماری هوشمند و پایدار محیط‌های آموزشی با تمرکز بر پردیس‌ها و مدارس سبز

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه آموزش هنر، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران شمال، تهران، ایران
3 گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل نظام‌مند روندهای علمی معماری پایدار و هوشمند در فضاهای آموزشی (مدارس سبز و پردیس‌های دانشگاهی) طی سال‌های ۱۹۹۰ تا ۲۰۲۵ م. انجام شد تا تصویری جامع از وضعیت و مسیرهای آینده این حوزه فراهم شود.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر از نوع کاربردی با رویکرد کمی است که با به‌کارگیری روش ترکیبی (کمی- کیفی) انجام شده است. داده‌های مورد نیاز از پایگاه معتبرWeb of Science بر اساس یک راهبرد جستجوی بولین (Boolean Search Strategy) گردآوری شد. کلیدواژه‌های جست‌وجو در این پژوهش شامل «معماری پایدار»، «معماری هوشمند»، «مدارس سبز»، «پردیس دانشگاهی»، «تحلیل محتوا» و «ترسیم نقشه علمی» بوده و دامنه مطالعه، در رشته معماری و طراحی محیط‌های آموزشی با تمرکز بر محیط‌های یادگیری پایدار و هوشمند را دربرمی‌گیرد. داده‌‌ها پس از پالایش در نرم‌افزار Zotero و پردازش در نرم‌افزار VosViewer نسخه ۱.۶.۲۰، مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. این فرآیند، تحلیل شبکه‌های هم‌واژگانی، هم‌استنادی و همکاری بین‌المللی را امکان‌پذیر ساخت و در نهایت به شناسایی خوشه‌های مفهومی و نویسندگان کلیدی این حوزه منجر گردید.
یافته‌ها: پژوهش نشان می‌دهد تولید علم در حوزه معماری پایدار و هوشمندِ فضاهای آموزشی از دهه‌ ۲۰۰۰ م. به‌طور چشمگیری رشد کرده و با اهداف توسعه پایدار گسترش یافته است. بررسی ۷۳۶ سند علمی، شش خوشه مفهومی اصلی شامل طراحی پایدار، تجربه کاربری، بهره‌وری انرژی، سلامت شهری، مشارکت و آموزش محیطی و آموزش معماری با رویکرد اجتماعی- فرهنگی را آشکار ساخت همچنین، کشورهای ایالات متحده، چین، استرالیا و چند کشور اروپایی بیشترین سهم را در تولید دانش و شکل‌گیری شبکه‌های همکاری علمی این حوزه داشته‌اند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد معماری آموزشی از رویکرد انرژی‌محور به چارچوبی انسان‌محور و چندبعدی تحول یافته است و در آینده، با ترکیب فناوری‌های هوشمند، طراحی بیوفیلیک و مشارکتی، تحقق فضاهای آموزشی پایدار و عادلانه را دنبال خواهد کرد. در این میان، توجه به زمینه‌های فرهنگی - اقلیمی و تجربه کاربران، محور اصلی این تحول به شمار می‌رود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Scientometric Analysis of Research Trends in Smart and Sustainable Architecture in Educational Environments: With an Emphasis on Green Schools and Campuses

نویسندگان English

Milad Olfat 1
Faezeh Asadpour 2
Amir Hossein Shirdel 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Art Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad Univer-sity, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Plan-ning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends in sustainable and smart architecture within educational environments, with a particular focus on green schools and university campuses, during 1990 to 2025. Educational spaces, as crucial settings for knowledge development and social interaction, play a pivotal role in shaping sustainable behaviors among future generations. In recent decades, accelerated technological transformations, the global environmental crisis, and the necessity of aligning with sustainable development goals have highlighted the need for rethinking the design of educational facilities. Against this backdrop, this research aims to identify the intellectual structure, thematic clusters, and evolutionary trajectory of scholarly output in this field. Additionally, it seeks to determine the most influential authors, institutions, and countries contributing to the advancement of knowledge in sustainable and smart educational architecture.
Methodology: The study employs a bibliometric and science-mapping approach. Data were collected from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection, one of the most authoritative international scientific databases, ensuring comprehensive coverage of high-quality scholarly works. A total of 736 documents—including research articles, review papers, and conference proceedings—published between 1990 and August 2025 were retrieved. After eliminating duplicates and cleaning metadata using Zotero, the data were processed with VOSviewer version 1.6.20. The analysis involved co-citation, co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling techniques, enabling the identification of research fronts, intellectual foundations, and emerging topics. This multi-stage procedure ensured a systematic, transparent, and reproducible analysis of the field.
Findings: The temporal analysis revealed a relatively stable research output until the mid-2000s, followed by a significant surge beginning around 2010. This growth accelerated markedly post-2015, coinciding with the establishment of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This trend highlights the growing global recognition of sustainable educational environments as a critical research area. Citation analysis further identified highly influential works that established the theoretical foundations of the field, particularly those addressing biophilic design, environmental psychology, and international green building standards such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM). Conceptual mapping indicated six interconnected domains of inquiry that collectively shape the intellectual structure of the field: Sustainable and Environmental Design; User Experience and Spatial Quality; Energy Efficiency and Green Buildings; Health and Sustainable Urban Development; Environmental Participation and Education; and Architectural Education with a Socio-Cultural Approach. Research on sustainable architecture and environmental design emphasizes integrating ecological and biophilic principles into school and campus planning, while studies on human experience and spatial quality explore comfort, perception, and well-being, with particular attention to children and students. Another important stream focuses on energy efficiency and building performance, highlighting the role of advanced digital tools such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), the Internet of Things (IoT), and smart energy systems in enhancing resilience and resource management. A further cluster links health, learning, and urban sustainability, examining how educational spaces contribute to public health, urban green infrastructure, and the broader sustainability agenda. In parallel, investigations into participation, education, and environmental behavior underscore the importance of cultural, social, and behavioral aspects in achieving long-term sustainability. Finally, research on architectural pedagogy and socio-cultural sustainability stresses the responsibility of architectural education and design studios in embedding cultural identity, social equity, and participatory practices into sustainable design processes. International collaboration analysis revealed that the United States, China, Australia, and several European countries are the leading contributors, forming robust scientific networks and advancing global standards. In contrast, developing countries in Asia and the Middle East are increasingly present in this field but face persistent challenges in adapting universal sustainability frameworks to their specific socio-cultural and climatic conditions. The findings also highlight a prevailing imbalance between technically oriented quantitative studies and the relative scarcity of qualitative, user-centered research that captures the lived experiences of students and communities within sustainable educational environments.
Conclusion: The study concludes that research in sustainable and smart educational architecture has evolved from a narrow, technology- and energy-focused perspective to a multidimensional, interdisciplinary framework that integrates environmental, social, cultural, and psychological dimensions. Future directions are expected to be shaped by the convergence of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things (IoT), and digital twins, alongside participatory and biophilic design approaches. This paradigm shift will require bridging the gap between global frameworks and local conditions, ensuring that sustainable educational environments not only optimize energy performance but also promote well-being, equity, and a sense of place for students and communities. By providing a systematic mapping of the field over three and a half decades, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the intellectual landscape and future opportunities in sustainable and smart architecture for educational settings. The insights can guide policymakers, architects, and researchers in developing integrated strategies to design schools and campuses that serve as models of resilience, innovation, and ecological responsibility.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable architecture
Smart architecture
Green schools
University campus
Mapping
Content analysis
اسلامیه، ف.، اولادیان، م.، و صفری، م. (1399). اولویت‌بندی مولفه‌های مدارس سبز با رویکرد فازی در نظام آموزش و پرورش ایران. رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 11(41)، 283–304.
بارشادت، ن.، شعاعی، ح.، و رضوانی، ع. (1398). تبیین مولفه‌ها و شاخص‌های پایداری محیطی فضاهای آموزشی ایران با تاکید بر سیستم‌های ارزیابی فضاهای سبز آموزشی. محیط‌شناسی، ۴۵(۱)، ۱۷۱- ۱۹۲.
باقری کراچی، الف.، کوثری، م.، و باقری سروستانی، ل. (1400). بررسی میزان کاربست مؤلفه های مدرسه سبز در مدارس. نشریه علمی محیط زیست و توسعه، ۱۲(۲۴)، 93-81.
رهایی، ا.، صالحی، ص. س.، و شیردل، ا. (1403). بهبود وضعیت تهویه طبیعی در کلاس‌های درس مدارس مسجدسلیمان بر اساس وضعیت بازشوها و تیغه‌های سایه‌انداز خارجی با روش CFD. معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 12(1)، 129–150. https://jsaud.sru.ac.ir/article_2203.html?lang=fa
محمودی، م. (۱۳۹۹). طراحی فضاهای آموزشی با رویکرد انعطاف‌پذیری. دانشگاه تهران، مؤسسه انتشارات و چاپ. https://fidibo.com/book/108904
مهدی‌نژاد، ج.، شرقی، ع.، و اسدپور، ف. (1397). اثرات عوامل اقتصادی در ساختار کالبدی مسکن روستایی پایدار [مقاله کنفرانسی]. چهارمین همایش ملی معماری و شهر پایدار، تهران. https://civilica.com/doc/872913
مهدی‌نژاد، ج.، و شیردل، الف. ح. (۱۴۰۳). تحلیل و رتبه‌بندی عوامل موثر بر طراحی مسکن پایدار در اقلیم سرد و خشک سبزوار مبتنی بر بهینه‌سازی مصرف انرژی. معماری و محیط پایدار، ۲(۲)، 10-1.
Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2021). Scientific production and thematic breakthroughs in smart learning environments: A bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00145-4
Akdari, P. O., Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012). Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementation in developing countries. Buildings, 2(2), 126–152.  https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2020126
Alhassan, M., Ayah Alkhawaldeh, Nour Betoush, Ansam Sawalha, Amaireh, L., & Onaizi, A. (2024). Harmonizing smart technologies with building resilience and sustainable built environment systems. Results in Engineering, 22, 102158.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Asadpour, F., & Asadpour, A. (2014). Optimization of energy consumption using solar bath in the hot and dry climate of Iran. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3(3(s)), 40-49. https://european-science.com/eojnss/article/view/1850
Asadpour, F., & Habibi, A. (2015). Strategies for climatic design for sustainable urban housing development: A case study of Nur City, Mazandaran, Iran. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 36(6), 653–664. https://arastirmax.com/sites/default/files/filefield_paths/5000138947-5000240236-1-pb.pdf
Asadpour, F., Khastoo, S., & Rezaeian Fard, M. H. (2016). Using wind turbines in high-rise buildings in the development of sustainable architecture: A case study of Kish Island. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(3), 1069–1084.
Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, M., Keivani, A., Moehler, R. C., Jelodari, N., & Roshdi Laleh, S. (2022). Internet of things (IoT), Building information modeling (BIM), and digital twin (DT) in construction industry: A Review, Bibliometric, and Network Analysis. Buildings, 12(10), 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101503
Bagherikerachi, A., Kowsari, M., & Bagheri Sarvestani, L. (2022). Assessing the application of green schools’ components in primary education institutes. Environment and Development, 12(24), 81–93. https://www.iraneiat.ir/article_167763.html?lang=en
      [In Persian].
Bareshadat, N., Shoaei, H., & Rezvani, A. (2019-a). Evaluation of environmental sustainability components and architecture design of Iranian educational buildings. Quarterly of Geographical Research, 34(4), 559-566. http://georesearch.ir/article-1-820-en.html
Bareshadat, N., Shoaei, H., & Rezvani, A. (2019-b). Explaining the components and indices of environmental sustainability in Iran’s educational spaces, with an emphasis on green educational building evaluation systems. Journal of Environmental Studies, 45(1), 171-192.
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255.
Briones-Bitar, J., Pinto-Ponce, B., Caicedo-Potosí, J., Santos-Baquerizo, E., Carrión-Mero, P., & Morante-Carballo, F. (2025). Evolution of smart buildings: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(4), 1369-1383. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200403
Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2015). The 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment (2nd ed.). Terrapin Bright Green. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/14-patterns
Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441
Chen, Y., Wang, X., Liu, Z., Cui, J., Osmani, M., & Demian, P. (2023). Exploring Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT) Integration for Sustainable Building. Buildings, 13(2), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020288
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.
De Luca, G., Ballarini, I., Paragamyan, A., Pellegrino, A., & Corrado, V. (2021). On the improvement of indoor environmental quality, energy performance and costs for a commercial nearly zero-energy building. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 27(8), 1056–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2021.1940275
Ding, X., Cui, Y., Chen, Z., & Zhang, H. (2024). Energy efficiency in biophilic architecture: A systematic literature review and visual analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Buildings, 14(12), 3800. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123800
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Dunk, J. (2022). Psychology as if the whole earth mattered: Nuclear threat, environmental crisis, and the emergence of planetary psychology. History of Psychology, 25(2), 97–120. 
Eslamieh, F., Oladiyan, M., & Safari, M. (2020). Prioritizing green components with a fuzzy approach in Iran's education system. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 11(41), 283-304. https://jedu.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_4119.html?lang=en
      [In Persian].
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Guerrieri, M., La Gennusa, M., Peri, G., Rizzo, G., & Scaccianoce, G. (2019). University campuses as small-scale models of cities: Quantitative assessment of a low-carbon transition path. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 113, 109263.
Harris, A., & Holman Jones, S. (2023). A creative ecological approach to supporting young people with mental health challenges in schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 37(2), 372–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2233938
Hashim Mohammed, B., Sallehuddin, H., Safie, N., Husairi, A., Abu Bakar, N. A., Yahya, F., Ali, I., & AbdelGhany Mohamed, S. (2022). Building information modeling and internet of things integration in the construction industry: A scoping study. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, e7886497. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7886497
Hotar, N., Apdik, S. N., Tokuç, A., & Baran, B. (2024). A systematic review on the design of sustainable education spaces. The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 19(1), 195–215.
Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 305–328.
Kalaycı Alas, D., & Korutürk, K. (2024). Exploring the impact of values education on sustainable environmental awareness and behavior among eighth-grade students. Sustainability, 16(21), 9302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219302
Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2013). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. John Wiley & Sons.
Li, J., Liu, Z., Han, G., Demian, P., & Osmani, M. (2024). The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and building information modeling (BIM) technologies for sustainable building in the context of smart cities. Sustainability, 16(24), 10848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410848
Mahdi Nejad, J., & Asadpour, F. (2019). A strategy for sustainable development: Using nanotechnology for solar energy in buildings (Case study Parand Town). Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 51(1), 103–120.
Mahdi Nejad, J., & Shirdel, A. H. (2025). Analysis and ranking of the factors affecting the design of sustainable housing in the cold and dry climate of Iran on the optimization of energy consumption: A case study of Sabzevar city. Journal of Sustainable Architecture & Environment (JSAE, 6, 1–10. https://www.sid.ir/paper/1501328/fa [In Persian].
Mahdi Nejad, J., Sharghi, A., & Asadpour, F. (2018). The effects of economic factors on the physical structure of sustainable rural housing [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 4th National Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/872913 [In Persian].
Mahmoudi, M. M. (2021). Designing Educational Spaces with a Flexible Approach. Tehran University Press. https://fidibo.com/book/108904 [In Persian].
Meiboudi, H., Lahijanian, A., Shafeian, M., & Ghoochani, O. M. (2016). Creating an integrative assessment system for green schools in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 119, 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.004
Meiboudi, H., Lahijanian, A., Shobeiri, S. M., Jozi, S. A., & Azizinezhad, R. (2017). Development and validation of sustainability criteria of administrative green schools in Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 605–609.
Mi, Z. (2024). Sustainable architectural practices: Integrating green design, smart technologies, and ultra-low energy concepts. Theoretical and Natural Science, 48, 62–67.
Michalos, A. C. (Ed.). (2014). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.
Newberry, P., Harper, P., & Morgan, T. (2021). Understanding the market for eco self-build community housing. Sustainability, 13(21), 11823. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111823
Omrany, H., Chang, R., Soebarto, V., Zhang, Y., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Zuo, J. (2022). A bibliometric review of net zero energy building research 1995–2022. Energy and Buildings, 262, 111996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111996
Quevedo, T. C., Geraldi, M. S., Melo, A. P., & Lamberts, R. (2024). Benchmarking energy consumption in universities: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 82, 108185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108185
Rahaee, O., Salehi, S. S., & Shirdel, A. (2024). Improving the quality of natural ventilation in Masjedsoleiman's Schools' classrooms based on the openings' position and the outdoor shading blades with CFD Method. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 12(1), 129-150. https://jsaud.sru.ac.ir/article_2203.html?lang=en [In Persian].
Rodríguez-Gracia, D., Capobianco-Uriarte, M. de las M., Terán-Yépez, E., Piedra-Fernández, J. A., Iribarne, L., & Ayala, R. (2023). Review of artificial intelligence techniques in green/smart buildings. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 38, 100861.
Salama, A. M., & Wilkinson, N. (Eds.). (2007). Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future. Urban International Press. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Design-Studio-Pedagogy-Horizons-Future/dp/1872811094
Salameh, M. M. (2018). Courtyards as Passive Design Solution for School Buildings in Hot Areas: UAE as a Case Study [Unpublished doctoral theses]. The British University in Dubai. https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/items/0c167b8a-b336-43b5-ad01-78a690876c05
Singgih, I. K., Prabowo, A. R., Soegiharto, S., Singgih, M. L., & Dharma, F. P. (2025). Smart campus applications: A literature review on operations research and big data. International Journal of Technology, 16(3), 796. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v16i3.6803
Siwi, M. K., Djatmika, E. T., Mukhlis, I., Sumarsono, H., & Santoso, M. H. (2025). The evolution of sustainable development in higher education: A bibliometric analysis (2014–2024). Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(1), 2026046. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026046
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
Tomadon, L. da S., do Couto, E. V., de Vries, W. T., & Moretto, Y. (2024). Smart city and sustainability indicators: A bibliometric literature review. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00328-w
Tucker, R., & Izadpanahi, P. (2017). Live green, think green: Sustainable school architecture and children’s environmental attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.003
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402
United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. Retrieved May 16, 2024, from
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Wang, K. (2024). Mapping the global knowledge landscape of digital transformation in the AEC industry: A scientometric analysis. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 32(10), 6445–6479. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2023-1174
Wilson, E. O. (1997). In Search of Nature. Princeton University Press.
Zaballos, A., Briones, A., Massa, A., Centelles, P., & Caballero, V. (2020). A smart campus’ digital twin for sustainable comfort monitoring. Sustainability, 12(21), 9196.
Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. Y. (2014). Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271-281.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.