پژوهش نامه علم سنجی

پژوهش نامه علم سنجی

روندها و ساختار دانشی و الگوی همکاری علمی در حوزه تجربه مشتری در محصولات ارگانیک: تحلیلی کتاب‌سنجی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، دانشکده مدیریت کسب و کار، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت بازاریابی، پردیس بین‌المللی کیش دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف: این پژوهش با رویکرد کتاب‌سنجی و تحلیل شبکه‌ای، 229 مقاله منتشرشده طی سال‌های 2010 تا 2025 م. درباره تجربه مشتری در محصولات ارگانیک را بررسی می‌کند. با توجه به رشد صنعت ارگانیک و دغدغه‌های مصرف‌کنندگان نسبت به سلامت و پایداری، این پژوهش تصویری جامع از وضعیت کنونی و مسیرهای آتی پژوهش‌ها ارائه می‌دهد.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش با رویکرد مرور نظام‌مند و تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی انجام شد. داده‌ها از پایگاه‌ وب Web of Science برای دوره 2010 تا 2025 م. استخراج شدند. جست‌وجو با استفاده کلیدواژه‌های مرتبط با «تجربه مشتری» و «محصولات ارگانیک» صورت گرفت و پس از پالایش طبق چارچوب پریزما(PRISMA) ، ۲۲۸ مقاله برای تحلیل انتخاب شد. تحلیل‌ها با استفاده از VOSviewer و بسته Bibliometrixانجام شد و شامل بررسی شبکه‌های مفهومی، هم‌رخدادی کلیدواژه‌ها، روند زمانی انتشار مقالات و الگوهای همکاری علمی بود.
یافته‌ها: چین با 24 مقاله (10.5٪) بیشترین سهم را در تولیدات علمی این حوزه داشت و پس از آن ایالات متحده، ایتالیا، هند، اسپانیا و آلمان قرار گرفتند. همچنین، ایتالیا، ترکیه و بریتانیا بیشترین همکاری‌های بین‌المللی را داشته‌اند. در میان نشریات، British Food Journal با 35 مقاله (15.3٪) و 922 استناد، و Journal of Cleaner Production با 12 مقاله و 1457 استناد، اثرگذارترین منابع بودند. همچنین، مجلات Sustainability (24 مقاله)، FOODS (19 مقاله) وFood Quality and Preference (13 مقاله) سهم قابل توجهی در شکل‌دهی به ادبیات علمی این حوزه داشته‌اند.
نتیجه‌گیری: پژوهش‌های مرتبط با تجربه مشتری در محصولات ارگانیک روندی رو به رشد داشته و ماهیتی میان‌رشته‌ای یافته‌‌اند. اگرچه چین از نظر کمیت پیشتاز است، اما همکاری‌های علمی در اروپا و آسیای جنوب‌شرقی نقش مهمی در توسعه نظری در این حوزه ایفا می‌کنند. موضوعاتی مانند پایداری و اصالت همچنان در مرکز توجه‌اند و مسائلی مانند بازاریابی دیجیتال و رفتار مصرف‌کننده در کشورهای در حال توسعه نیازمند بررسی بیشتر است. این نتایج علاوه بر توسعه نظری ، می‌تواند مبنابی برای تصمیم‌گیری سیاست‌گذاران و فعالان بازار فراهم آورد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Trends, Knowledge Structure, and Scientific Collaboration Patterns in Customer Experience Research on Organic Products: A Scientometric Analysis

نویسندگان English

Amir Khanlari 1
Elaheh Shadkam 2
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Business Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate in Marketing Management, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Purpose: This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric and network-based analysis of 229 peer-reviewed articles (2010–2025) focusing on customer experience within the organic products domain. With the rapid expansion of the organic food market and growing consumer interest in sustainability, health, authenticity, food safety, and ethical concerns, customer experience has become a crucial factor in understanding purchasing behavior. Despite the increasing number of studies on organic consumption, consolidated knowledge regarding the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and collaboration patterns remains limited. Previous reviews have typically been restricted to specific subthemes such as consumer attitudes, willingness to pay, or food safety, or have concentrated on individual geographic regions. In contrast, this study aims to provide a holistic overview of the global research landscape by examining key bibliometric indicators, identifying leading scholars, institutions, and countries, and mapping the most influential journals and articles.
Methodology: Data collection and screening were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to ensure transparency and replicability. The search was performed exclusively in the Web of Science database, selected for its broad coverage and reliability in bibliometric studies. A total of 438 initial records were retrieved using Boolean combinations of keywords related to “customer experience” and “organic products.” After removing duplicates, limiting the document types to research articles, reviews, and conference papers, restricting the time span to 2010–2025, and excluding non-English sources, the dataset was reduced to 334 records. Through independent abstract screening by two reviewers, 229 articles were confirmed for the final analysis. Bibliometric evaluation employed both VOSviewer for network visualization and the Bibliometrix R package for quantitative indicators. Variables analyzed included citation counts, h-index, g-index, and m-index, as well as patterns of co-authorship (single- versus multi-country publications), institutional productivity, and keyword co-occurrence. This combined approach enabled both quantitative assessment and qualitative interpretation of intellectual linkages, thematic clusters, and evolving research fronts.
Findings: The results reveal that China has emerged as the most prolific contributor, with 24 publications (10.5%), followed by the USA, Italy, India, Spain, and Germany. While China’s output is mainly characterized by domestic collaboration, countries such as Italy, Turkey, and the United Kingdom demonstrate higher levels of international cooperation, reflecting a more globalized research approach. Institutional analysis shows that European universities play a central role in cross-border partnerships, whereas Asian institutions dominate in terms of volume. At the journal level, the British Food Journal stands out with 35 articles (15.3%) and 922 citations, exhibiting the highest h-index and g-index among the analyzed sources. The Journal of Cleaner Production, despite publishing only 12 articles, recorded the largest total citations (1,457), highlighting its strong impact. Additionally, Sustainability (24 articles), FOODS (19 articles), and Food Quality and Preference (13 articles) also rank among the leading journals, with a strong focus on sustainability, food sciences, and consumer behavior. Collectively, these outlets have significantly shaped the scientific discourse on customer experience in organic product markets. Keyword co-occurrence analysis further highlights the evolution of the field: early studies emphasized consumer awareness, demand, and general attitudes, while recent years have seen a shift toward concepts such as purchase intention, perceived value, consumer trust, and green branding. Emerging terms like “life-cycle assessment,” “digital marketing,” and “cross-cultural behavior” indicate the diversification of research themes and the growing interdisciplinarity of the field.
Conclusion: This study provides a structured overview of the evolving research landscape on customer experience in organic product markets. The findings highlight the interdisciplinary character and dynamic growth of the field, as well as its geographic diversity, with China leading in publication output, while European and Southeast Asian scholars play a central role in shaping conceptual development through cross-border collaborations. The prominence of themes such as consumer trust, sustainability, authenticity, and purchase intention reflects global trends in marketing ethics and consumer behavior. Simultaneously, the identification of emerging areas—such as digital communication strategies, green branding, and cross-cultural differences—points to promising directions for future research. The study underscores the value of bibliometric analysis as a methodological tool to consolidate fragmented knowledge, map intellectual structures, and reveal hidden connections across disciplines. These insights hold not only theoretical significance but also practical implications for marketers, producers, and policymakers seeking to build trust, enhance customer satisfaction, and foster responsible consumption in the organic sector. For marketers and producers, understanding consumer values and trust dynamics can guide strategies for brand positioning and product differentiation. For policymakers, evidence on sustainability and labeling can support regulations that align with consumer expectations and global environmental goals. Finally, for academics, this synthesis clarifies the current state of knowledge and identifies conceptual gaps that future studies can address. By mapping intellectual structures and identifying research frontiers, this study lays the foundation for advancing research that is both conceptually robust and practically relevant, contributing to the broader agenda of sustainable consumption and ethical marketing.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Bibliometric analysis
Customer experience
Knowledge structure
Organic product
خیرالهی، م.، عالی، م.، و تقی‌زاده، الف. (۱۴۰۰). طراحی مدل ارتقای نگرش مشتریان به محصولات غذایی ارگانیک در ایران. مطالعات رفتار مصرف‌کننده، ۸(۲)، ۱۷۶–۱۹۹. http://dx.doi.org/10.34785/J018.2021.828
شریفی، ر.، خیری، ب.، و رحمتی غفرانی، ی. (۱۴۰۰). مدل رفتاری خریداران واقعی محصولات ارگانیک در استان گیلان. فصلنامه مدیریت کشاورزی و توسعه، ۱۱(۲)، ۲۴۵–۲۶۰.
مختاری، ح.، خانلری، الف.، و اسفیدانی، م. (1400). شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر تجربه مشتری با رویکرد فراترکیب. چشم‌انداز مدیریت بازرگانی، 20(48)، 142-176. https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_102398.html
مصطفوی، الف.، و صراف، س. (1403). تحلیل محتوا و ارزیابی تولیدات علمی در حوزه غذای ارگانیک: یک مطالعه علم‌سنجی. نشریه کاسپین علم‌سنجی، 11(1)، 11–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.11.1.11
نوروزی چاکلی، س.، و موسوی خانقاه، الف. (1405). تحلیل ساختار دانشی، تکامل موضوعی و جهت‌گیری‌های آینده و نوظهور در پژوهش‌های طراحی رابط کاربری برای هوش مصنوعی توضیح‌پذیر (XAI) در داشبوردهای تصمیم‌گیری: مطالعه‌ای علم‌سنجی. پژوهش‌نامه علم‌سنجی، ۱۲(۲)، ۲۳۵- ۲۶۸.
نوروزی چاکلی، ع.، نوروزی چاکلی، س.، و نوروزی، ح. (۱۴۰۳). شناسایی ابعاد، چالش‌ها، معیارها، شاخص‌ها و الزامات مطرح در چرخه داوری علمی ارزیابانه عملیاتی و ارائه چارچوبی برای داوری آثار علمی در کشور [گزارش طرح پژوهشی]. وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، معاونت پژوهش و فناوری. بازیابی شده در اردیبهشت ۲۵، ۱۴۰۵، از https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32964269
Abrar, K. M., & Verma, A. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of research trends in organic foods: a retrospective scientometric overview (2014-2023). Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 10306-10327. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5644
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akhter, S., Pauyo, T., & Khan, M. (2019). What is the difference between a systematic review and a meta-analysis? In V. Musahl, J. Karlsson, M. T. Hirschmann, O. R. Ayeni, R. G. Marx, J. L. Koh, & N. Nakamura (Eds.), Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research: A Practical Guide and Case-Based Research Approach (pp. 331–342). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_37
Akter, S., Ali, S., Fekete-Farkas, M., Fogarassy, C., & Lakner, Z. (2023). Why organic food? Factors influence the organic food purchase intension in an emerging country (Study from northern part of Bangladesh). Resources, 12(1), 5.
AlRyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W., & Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), (152), e58494. https://doi.org/10.3791/58494
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Asioli, D., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Caputo, V., Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., Næs, T., & Varela, P. (2017). Making sense of the clean label trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Research International, 99(Part 1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022
Bravo, C. P., Cordts, A., Schulze, B., & Spiller, A. (2013). Assessing determinants of organic food consumption using data from the German National Nutrition Survey II. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.010
Brumă, I. S., Jelea, A. R., Rodino, S., Bertea, P. E., Butu, A., & Chițea, M. A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of organic farming and voluntary certifications. Agriculture, 13(11), 2107. http://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112107
Chen, J., & Lobo, A. (2012). Organic food products in China: Determinants of consumers' purchase intentions. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 22(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2012.682596
Cicciù, B., & Carmona, L. J. D. M. (2024). The impact of consumer skepticism on the perceived value of organic food and purchase intention. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 17, e8. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465985505
Cramarenco, R. E., Burca-Voicu, M. I., & Dabija, D. C. (2023). Organic food consumption during the covid-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Amfiteatru Economic, 25, 1042-1063. http://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2023/S17/1042.
El Nemar, S., El-Chaarani, H., El-Abiad, Z., El-Fawal, A., & Badawy, H. (2023). The relationship between customer perceptions of green marketing influence on buying behavior. In P. Ordóñez de Pablos, X. Zhang, & M. Almunawar (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Management in Asia’s Digital Economy (pp. 399-429). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of pubmed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Galutskykh, N. A., & Didorchuk, I. L. (2024). The current trends in the world market of organic products. Business Inform, 2, 20–26. Retrieved June 21, 2025, from
Golijan Pantović, J., & Dimitrijević, B. (2018). Global organic food market. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 23(46), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.5937/AASer1846125g
Gottschalk, F. C. (2018, February 12). What characterizes credence goods? A critical look at the literature. A Critical Look at the Literature. SSRN. Retrieved June 24, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3114257
Grzywińska-Rąpca, M., Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M., Jakubowska, D., & Banach, J. K. (2025). The perception of organic food characteristics and the demographic and social profile of consumers: A study of the polish market. Foods, 14(2), 308.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Harniyati, H., & Abdul Wahid, N. (2023). Conceptualizing customer experience in organic food purchase using cognitive-affective-behaviour model. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 6(2), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.6.2.2023.9732
Hroma, I. (2024). Interconnection of organic agriculture, health, and sustainability: Bibliometric analysis. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(4), 47-74.
Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz, C. J., II, & Stanton, J. (2007). Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(2–3), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.210
Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food Quality and Preference, 25(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.12.004
Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2014). I eat organic for my benefit and yours: Egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 18–32.
Khaerolahi, H., Aali, S., & Taghizadeh, H. (2021). Designing a model to improve the attitude of customers to organic food products in Iran. Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 8(2), 176-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.34785/J018.2021.828 [In Persian].
Krystallis, A., Fotopoulos, C., & Zotos, Y. (2006). Organic consumers’ profile and their willingness to pay (WTP) for selected organic food products in Greece. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 19(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v19n01_05
Kühl, S., Bayer, E., & Schulze, M. (2023). The role of trust, expectation, and deception when buying organic animal products. Animal Frontiers, 13(1), 40-47.
Kumar, B., Sharma, A., Vatavwala, S., & Kumar, P. (2020). Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.018
Lee, H. J., & Yun, Z. S. (2015). Consumers' perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002
Mai, N. T., Phuong, T. T. L., Dat, T. T., & Truong, D. D. (2023). Determinants of organic food purchasing intention: an empirical study of local consumers in Da Nang city, central Vietnam. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1180612.
Michałowska, M., Kułyk, P., & Pietrow, L. (2024). Consumer risk in the purchasing process in the organic food market. Sustainability, 16(21), 9205. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219205
Mokhtari, H., Khanlari, A., & Esfidani, M. R. (2021). Identification of factors affecting customer experience using a meta‐synthesis approach. Business Management Perspective, 20(48), 142–176. https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_102398.html [In Persian].
Mostafavi, I., & Sarraf, S. (2024). Content analysis and evaluation of scientific productions in the subject area of organic food: A scientometric study. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 11(1), 11-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.11.1.11 [In Persian].
Nagy, L. B., Lakner, Z., & Temesi, Á. (2022). Is it really organic? credibility factors of organic food–a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0266855.
Nordin, N., Khalid, S. N. A., Ibrahim, N. A., & Samsudin, M. A. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of publication trends in family firms’ social capital in emerging economies. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 8(1), 144–179.
Noroozi Chakoli, A., Noroozi Chakoli, S., & Norouzi, H. (2024). Identifying the Dimensions, Challenges, Criteria, Indicators, and Requirements of the Scholarly Peer Review Process and Proposing a Framework for the Evaluation of Scientific Works in Iran [Research project]. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran, Deputy of Research and Technology. Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32964269
      [In Persian].
Noroozi Chakoli, S., & Mousavi Khaneghah, E. (2026). Analysis of the knowledge structure, thematic evolution, and emerging and future research directions in user interface design for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Decision-Making Dashboards: A scientometric study. Scientometrics Research Journal, 12(2), 235-268.
Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5
Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107(8), 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700510611002
Pant, S. C., Saxena, R., Pant, D. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Organic food consumption: A bibliometric–content analysis. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(5), 2730-2750.
Pedersen, S., Zhang, T., Zhou, Y., Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Thøgersen, J. (2023). Consumer attitudes towards imported organic food in China and Germany: The key importance of trust. Journal of Macromarketing, 43(2), 233–254.
Pilař, L., Kvasničková Stanislavská, L., Rojík, S., Kvasnička, R., Poláková, J., & Gresham, G. (2018). Customer experience with organic food: Global view. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 30(11), 918–926.  https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i11.1856
Qomara, A. S., & Noer, L. R. (2025). Global trends in organic food research: A bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 6(3), 1158–1172.
Raj, V. A., Jasrotia, S. S., Rai, S. S., & Ansari, I. A. (2024). A bibliometric review of organic menus at restaurants: Research streams and future research path. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25(4), 1043-1069.
Rana, J., & Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 157–165.
Rokaya, A. B., & Pandey, A. C. (2023). Consumer perceptions of organic products: A study in Birendranagar, Surkhet. The International Research Journal of Management Science, 8(1), 1–13. Retrieved March 18, 2024, from
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to special topic forum: Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. http://www.jstor.org/stable/259285
Roy, A., Ghosh, A., & Vashisht, D. (2023). The consumer perception and purchasing attitude towards organic food: A critical review. Nutrition & Food Science, 53(3), 578–599.
Sangkumchaliang, P., & Huang, W. C. (2012). Consumers’ perceptions and attitudes of organic food products in Northern Thailand. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(1), 87–102. Retrieved August 12, 2024, from 
Sharifi, R., Kheiri, B., & Rahmati-Ghafrani, Y. (2021). Behavioral model of real buyers of organic products in Guilan province. Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 11(2), 245–260. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2321316 [In Persian].
Thøgersen, J., de Barcellos, M. D., Perin, M. G., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Consumer buying motives and attitudes towards organic food in two emerging markets: China and Brazil. International Marketing Review, 32(3-4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-06-2013-0123
Thomas, L. D., & Tee, R. (2022). Generativity: A systematic review and conceptual framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 255–278.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2019). Measuring science: Basic principles and application of advanced bibliometrics. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 237–280). Springer.
Wong, W. M., & Tzeng, S. Y. (2021). Mediating role of organic labeling awareness and food safety attitudes in the correlation between green product awareness and purchase Intentions. Sage Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061565
Yazdanpanah, M., Forouzani, M., & Hojjati, M. (2015). Willingness of Iranian young adults to eat organic foods: Application of the Health Belief Model. Food Quality and Preference, 41, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.012
Yiridoe, E. K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., & Martin, R. C. (2005). Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 20(4), 193–205.
Yu, W., Han, X., Ding, L., & He, M. (2021). Organic food corporate image and customer co-developing behavior: The mediating role of consumer trust and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102377.